Arsenic mobility in brownfield soils amended with green waste compost or biochar and planted with Miscanthus
Abstract
Degraded land that is historically contaminated from different sources of industrial waste provides an opportunity for conversion to bioenergy fuel production and also to increase sequestration of carbon in soil through organic amendments. In pot experiments, As mobility was investigated in three different brownfield soils amended with green waste compost (GWC, 30% v/v) or biochar (BC, 20% v/v), planted with Miscanthus. Using GWC improved crop yield but had little effect on foliar As uptake, although the proportion of As transferred from roots to foliage differed considerably between the three soils. It also increased dissolved carbon concentrations in soil pore water that influenced Fe and As mobility. Effects of BC were less pronounced, but the impacts of both amendments on SOC, Fe, P and pH are likely to be critical in the context of As leaching to ground water. Growing Miscanthus had no measurable effect on As mobility.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Hartley et al [33] concluded that M × g cultivation with biochar amendment did not have a significant effect on As mobility and plant development in the brownfield soil.
“Hartley et al [33] examined the potential for enhancing the phytoremediation process and biomass productivity using biochar from a mixture of hardwoods and concluded that M × g cultivation with biochar amendment did not have a significant effect on As mobility and plant development in the brownfield soil.”
From Differential effects of sewage sludge and food waste biochars on <i>Miscanthus × giganteus</i> phytostabilization on acidic brownfield soil (2026) · cites this paper as [33]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 63 · Cited by 285
- Authors
- Hartley, W., Dickinson, N. M., Riby, P., & Lepp, N. W.
- Affiliations
- Liverpool John Moores University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Hartley, William
- Venue
- Environmental Pollution
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-10
- Volume
- 157
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2654-2662
- ISSN
- 0269-7491 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1977937863
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 63
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 8.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Environmental Pollution (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Arsenic contamination and mitigation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Coal and Its By-products
- Keywords
- arsenic mobility, brownfield soils, green waste compost, biochar, Miscanthus, root-to-shoot translocation, dissolved organic carbon, soil organic carbon, arsenic leaching, contaminated site remediation, energy crops
- MeSH terms
- Adsorption, Arsenic, Charcoal, Poaceae, Soil Pollutants, Environmental Restoration and Remediation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review