Cited by 285Arsenic contamination and mitigationHeavy metals in environmentCoal and Its By-products

Arsenic mobility in brownfield soils amended with green waste compost or biochar and planted with Miscanthus

Hartley, William, Dickinson, Nicholas M., Riby, Philip, Lepp, Nicholas W.·2009·Environmental Pollution

Abstract

Degraded land that is historically contaminated from different sources of industrial waste provides an opportunity for conversion to bioenergy fuel production and also to increase sequestration of carbon in soil through organic amendments. In pot experiments, As mobility was investigated in three different brownfield soils amended with green waste compost (GWC, 30% v/v) or biochar (BC, 20% v/v), planted with Miscanthus. Using GWC improved crop yield but had little effect on foliar As uptake, although the proportion of As transferred from roots to foliage differed considerably between the three soils. It also increased dissolved carbon concentrations in soil pore water that influenced Fe and As mobility. Effects of BC were less pronounced, but the impacts of both amendments on SOC, Fe, P and pH are likely to be critical in the context of As leaching to ground water. Growing Miscanthus had no measurable effect on As mobility.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envpol.2009.05.011

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hartley et al [33] concluded that M × g cultivation with biochar amendment did not have a significant effect on As mobility and plant development in the brownfield soil.

    “Hartley et al [33] examined the potential for enhancing the phytoremediation process and biomass productivity using biochar from a mixture of hardwoods and concluded that M × g cultivation with biochar amendment did not have a significant effect on As mobility and plant development in the brownfield soil.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 63 · Cited by 285

Authors
Hartley, W., Dickinson, N. M., Riby, P., & Lepp, N. W.
Affiliations
Liverpool John Moores University (GB)
Corresponding author
Hartley, William
Venue
Environmental Pollution
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-10
Volume
157
Issue
10
Pages
2654-2662
ISSN
0269-7491 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1977937863
Cited by
285
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 11
FWCI
8.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Pollution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Arsenic contamination and mitigation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Coal and Its By-products
Keywords
arsenic mobility, brownfield soils, green waste compost, biochar, Miscanthus, root-to-shoot translocation, dissolved organic carbon, soil organic carbon, arsenic leaching, contaminated site remediation, energy crops
MeSH terms
Adsorption, Arsenic, Charcoal, Poaceae, Soil Pollutants, Environmental Restoration and Remediation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review