The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Carbon black vs. black carbon and other airborne materials containing elemental carbon: Physical and chemical distinctions
Open accessAbstract
Airborne particles containing elemental carbon (EC) are currently at the forefront of scientific and regulatory scrutiny, including black carbon, carbon black, and engineered carbon-based nanomaterials, e.g., carbon nanotubes, fullerenes, and graphene. Scientists and regulators sometimes group these EC-containing particles together, for example, interchangeably using the terms carbon black and black carbon despite one being a manufactured product with well-controlled properties and the other being an undesired, incomplete-combustion byproduct with diverse properties. In this critical review, we synthesize information on the contrasting properties of EC-containing particles in order to highlight significant differences that can affect hazard potential. We demonstrate why carbon black should not be considered a model particle representative of either combustion soots or engineered carbon-based nanomaterials. Overall, scientific studies need to distinguish these highly different EC-containing particles with care and precision so as to forestall unwarranted extrapolation of properties, hazard potential, and study conclusions from one material to another.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans
Zuckerman, A. J. (1995) · Journal of Clinical Pathology · doi:10.1136/jcp.48.7.691-a · Cited by 8,728
Light Absorption by Carbonaceous Particles: An Investigative Review
Bond, T. C., & Bergstrom, R. W. (2006) · Aerosol Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/02786820500421521 · Cited by 2,980
IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans
Hopkins, J. (1989) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/0278-6915(89)90054-9 · Cited by 2,876
Poland, C. A., Duffin, R., Kinloch, I., Maynard, A., Wallace, W. A. H., Seaton, A., Stone, V., Brown, S., MacNee, W., & Donaldson, K. (2008) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2008.111 · Cited by 2,645
Kittelson, D. B. (1998) · Journal of Aerosol Science · doi:10.1016/s0021-8502(97)10037-4 · Cited by 2,289
Black carbon or brown carbon? The nature of light-absorbing carbonaceous aerosols
Andreae, M. O., & Gelencsér, A. (2006) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-6-3131-2006 · Cited by 2,006
Woodsmoke Health Effects: A Review
Naeher, L. P., Brauer, M., Lipsett, M., Zelikoff, J. T., Simpson, C. D., Koenig, J. Q., & Smith, K. R. (2007) · Inhalation Toxicology · doi:10.1080/08958370600985875 · Cited by 1,530
Simultaneously Mitigating Near-Term Climate Change and Improving Human Health and Food Security
Shindell, D., Kuylenstierna, J. C. I., Vignati, E., van Dingenen, R., Amann, M., Klimont, Z., Anenberg, S. C., Muller, N., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Raes, F., et al. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1210026 · Cited by 1,382
Reid, J. S., Koppmann, R., Eck, T. F., & Eleuterio, D. P. (2005) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-5-799-2005 · Cited by 1,327
Biological Interactions of Graphene-Family Nanomaterials: An Interdisciplinary Review
Sanchez, V. C., Jachak, A., Hurt, R. H., & Kane, A. B. (2012) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/tx200339h · Cited by 1,263
Cited by
Joudeh, N., & Linke, D. (2022) · Journal of Nanobiotechnology · doi:10.1186/s12951-022-01477-8 · Cited by 1,908
Garg, S., Li, M., Weber, A. Z., Ge, L., Li, L., Rudolph, V., Wang, G., & Rufford, T. E. (2020) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/c9ta13298h · Cited by 478
Sturm, J., Rheinfeld, A., Zilberman, I., Spingler, F. B., Kosch, S., Frie, F., & Jossen, A. (2019) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.11.043 · Cited by 300
Wang, M., Park, J. H., Kabir, S., Neyerlin, K. C., Kariuki, N. N., Lv, H., Stamenkovic, V. R., Myers, D. J., Ulsh, M., & Mauger, S. A. (2019) · ACS Applied Energy Materials · doi:10.1021/acsaem.9b01037 · Cited by 192
The Controllable Design of Catalyst Inks to Enhance PEMFC Performance: A Review
Guo, Y., Pan, F., Chen, W., Ding, Z., Yang, D., Li, B., Ming, P., & Zhang, C. (2021) · Electrochemical Energy Reviews · doi:10.1007/s41918-020-00083-2 · Cited by 175
Metadata
- Authors
- Long, C. M., Nascarella, M. A., & Valberg, P. A.
- Venue
- Environmental Pollution
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-10
- Volume
- 181
- Pages
- 271-286
- ISSN
- 0269-7491 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2064191532
- Cited by
- 558
- References
- 77
- FWCI
- 6.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carbon black vs. black carbon and other airborne materials containing elemental carbon: Physical and chemical distinctions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.06.009
- The paper
- Long, C. M., Nascarella, M. A., & Valberg, P. A. (2013). Carbon black vs. black carbon and other airborne materials containing elemental carbon: Physical and chemical distinctions. Environmental Pollution. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.06.009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
