Cited by 365Microplastics and Plastic PollutionEnvironmental Toxicology and EcotoxicologyMarine Ecology and Invasive Species

Long-term microplastic retention causes reduced body condition in the langoustine, Nephrops norvegicus

Welden, Natalie A.C., Cowie, Phillip R.·2016·Environmental Pollution

Abstract

Microplastic represents a rising proportion of marine litter and is widely distributed throughout a range of marine habitats. Correspondingly, the number of reports of species containing microplastics increases annually. Nephrops norvegicus in the Firth of Clyde have previously been shown to retain large aggregations of microplastic fibres. The potential for N. norvegicus to retain plastic over an extended time period increases the likelihood of any associated negative impacts to the individual. This study represents the longest observation of the impacts of microplastic retention in invertebrates. We exposed N. norvegicus to plastic over eight months to determine the impacts of extended exposure. Over this period we compared the feeding rate, body mass, and nutritional state of plastic-fed N. norvegicus to that of fed and starved control groups. Following the experimental period, the plastic-fed langoustine contained microplastic aggregations comparable to those of small individuals from the Clyde Sea Area. Comparisons between fed, unfed and plastic-fed individuals indicated a reduction in feeding rate, body mass, and metabolic rate as well as catabolism of stored lipids in plastic contaminated animals. We conclude that N. norvegicus exposed to high levels of environmental microplastic pollution may experience reduced nutrient availability. This can result in reduced population stability and may affect the viability of local fisheries.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.08.020

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 365

Authors
Welden, N. A. C., & Cowie, P. R.
Affiliations
  • Stockholm Environment Institute (GB)
  • Field Studies Council (GB)
Corresponding author
Welden, Natalie A.C.
Venue
Environmental Pollution
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-11
Volume
218
Pages
895-900
ISSN
0269-7491 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2516116663
Cited by
365
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 1
FWCI
11.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Pollution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine Ecology and Invasive Species
Keywords
microplastics, Norway lobster, microplastic retention, long-term exposure, body condition, feeding rate, body mass, metabolic rate, lipid degradation, nutrient availability, marine litter, Firth of Clyde, fisheries impacts
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Feed, Body Weight, Environmental Monitoring, Fisheries, Nephropidae, Male, Polypropylenes, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Ecosystem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review