Long-term microplastic retention causes reduced body condition in the langoustine, Nephrops norvegicus
Abstract
Microplastic represents a rising proportion of marine litter and is widely distributed throughout a range of marine habitats. Correspondingly, the number of reports of species containing microplastics increases annually. Nephrops norvegicus in the Firth of Clyde have previously been shown to retain large aggregations of microplastic fibres. The potential for N. norvegicus to retain plastic over an extended time period increases the likelihood of any associated negative impacts to the individual. This study represents the longest observation of the impacts of microplastic retention in invertebrates. We exposed N. norvegicus to plastic over eight months to determine the impacts of extended exposure. Over this period we compared the feeding rate, body mass, and nutritional state of plastic-fed N. norvegicus to that of fed and starved control groups. Following the experimental period, the plastic-fed langoustine contained microplastic aggregations comparable to those of small individuals from the Clyde Sea Area. Comparisons between fed, unfed and plastic-fed individuals indicated a reduction in feeding rate, body mass, and metabolic rate as well as catabolism of stored lipids in plastic contaminated animals. We conclude that N. norvegicus exposed to high levels of environmental microplastic pollution may experience reduced nutrient availability. This can result in reduced population stability and may affect the viability of local fisheries.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Impacts of microplastics on fish represent a concern in terms of reducing the quality and quantity of fish as a food source.
“These, and other impacts on fish, represent a concern in terms of reducing the quality and quantity of fish as a food source.75”
From Microplastics and Anthropogenic Particles in Recreationally Caught Freshwater Fish from an Urbanized Region of the North American Great Lakes (2024) · cites this paper as [75]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 45 · Cited by 365
- Authors
- Welden, N. A. C., & Cowie, P. R.
- Affiliations
- Stockholm Environment Institute (GB)
- Field Studies Council (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Welden, Natalie A.C.
- Venue
- Environmental Pollution
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-11
- Volume
- 218
- Pages
- 895-900
- ISSN
- 0269-7491 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2516116663
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 11.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Environmental Pollution (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine Ecology and Invasive Species
- Keywords
- microplastics, Norway lobster, microplastic retention, long-term exposure, body condition, feeding rate, body mass, metabolic rate, lipid degradation, nutrient availability, marine litter, Firth of Clyde, fisheries impacts
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Animal Feed, Body Weight, Environmental Monitoring, Fisheries, Nephropidae, Male, Polypropylenes, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Ecosystem
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review