Cited by 404Microplastics and Plastic PollutionEnvironmental Toxicology and EcotoxicologyToxic Organic Pollutants Impact

Investigating a probable relationship between microplastics and potentially toxic elements in fish muscles from northeast of Persian Gulf

Akhbarizadeh, Razegheh, Moore, Farid, Keshavarzi, Behnam·2018·Environmental Pollution

Abstract

Although weekly consumption of fish is recommended, the presence of contaminants in seafood has raised many concerns regarding the benefits of fish intake. In the present study microplastics (MPs) and metals' concentration in muscles of both benthic and pelagic fish species from northeast of Persian Gulf were investigated and the risk/benefit of their consumption was assessed. The results demonstrated that MPs and Hg in all species and Se in benthic species increase with size, while relationship between other metals, and fish size is not consistent. Consumption of a meal ration of 300 and < 100 g/week for adults and children, respectively, is recommended since it would provide the required essential elements with no human health risk. On the other hand, the estimated intake of MPs from fish muscles revealed that the mean intake of MPs for P. indicus, E. coioides, A. djedaba, and S. jello consumption is 555, 240, 233, and 169 items/300 g-week, respectively. Moreover, the relationship between MPs and metals in fish muscles were positive for A. djedaba, and negative for E. coioides. Considering the chemical toxicity of MPs and metals, and their good linear relationships in some species, consumption of high doses of the studied fish may pose a health threat to the consumers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.09.028

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 62 · Cited by 404

Authors
Akhbarizadeh, R., Moore, F., & Keshavarzi, B.
Affiliations
Shiraz University (IR)
Corresponding author
Moore, Farid
Venue
Environmental Pollution
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-01
Volume
232
Pages
154-163
ISSN
0269-7491 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2757021730
Cited by
404
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 14
FWCI
10.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Pollution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Elites Foundation of Islamic Republic of Iran
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Keywords
microplastics, potentially toxic elements, fish muscle, mercury, selenium, benthic fish, pelagic fish, human health risk, Persian Gulf
MeSH terms
Adult, Animals, Child, Environmental Exposure, Fishes, Food Contamination, Humans, Mercury, Metals, Muscles, Plastics, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Water Pollution, Chemical, Seafood, Risk Assessment, Indian Ocean

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review