Aircraft soot from conventional fuels and biofuels during ground idle and climb-out conditions: electron microscopy and X-ray micro-spectroscopy
Open accessAbstract
Aircraft soot has a significant impact on global and local air pollution and is of particular concern for the population working at airports and living nearby. The morphology and chemistry of soot are related to its reactivity and depend mainly on engine operating conditions and fuel-type. We investigated the morphology (by transmission electron microscopy) and chemistry (by X-ray micro-spectroscopy) of soot from the exhaust of a CFM 56-7B26 turbofan engine, currently the most common engine in aviation fleet, operated in the test cell of SR Technics, Zurich airport. Standard kerosene (Jet A-1) and a biofuel blend (Jet A-1 with 32% HEFA) were used at ground idle and climb-out engine thrust, as these conditions highly influence air quality at airport areas. The results indicate that soot reactivity decreases from ground idle to climb-out conditions for both fuel types. Nearly one third of the primary soot particles generated by the blended fuel at climb-out engine thrust bear an outer amorphous shell implying higher reactivity. This characteristic referring to soot reactivity needs to be taken into account when evaluating the advantage of HEFA blending at high engine thrust. The soot type that is most prone to react with its surrounding is generated by Jet A-1 fuel at ground idle. Biofuel blending slightly lowers soot reactivity at ground idle but does the opposite at climb-out conditions. As far as soot reactivity is concerned, biofuels can prove beneficial for airports where ground idle is a common situation; the benefit of biofuels for climb-out conditions is uncertain.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Blending Jet A-1 with 35% BAF via HEFA generates less reactive soot when aircraft are idling or climbing out.
“Liati et al. (2019) reported that blending Jet A-1 with 35% BAF via HEFA generates less reactive soot when aircraft are idling (on the ground) or climbing out (during take-off).”
From Bio-aviation Fuel: A Comprehensive Review and Analysis of the Supply Chain Components (2020) · cites this paper as Liati et al. 2019
A 25% blend of BAF via HEFA and Jet A-1 produced less soot overall than pure Jet A-1.
“Liati et al. (2019) also discovered that a 25% blend of BAF via HEFA and Jet A-1 produced less soot overall than pure Jet A-1.”
From Bio-aviation Fuel: A Comprehensive Review and Analysis of the Supply Chain Components (2020) · cites this paper as Liati et al. 2019
PM arises from the incomplete combustion of the fuel and is mainly composed of soot and ash.
“PM arises from the incomplete combustion of the fuel and is mainly composed of soot and ash (Liati et al. 2019).”
From Bio-aviation Fuel: A Comprehensive Review and Analysis of the Supply Chain Components (2020) · cites this paper as Liati et al. 2019
Cites
Biofuel blending reduces particle emissions from aircraft engines at cruise conditions
Moore, R. H., Thornhill, K. L., Weinzierl, B., Sauer, D., D’Ascoli, E., Kim, J., Lichtenstern, M., Scheibe, M., Beaton, B., Beyersdorf, A. J., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature21420 · Cited by 414 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bio-aviation Fuel: A Comprehensive Review and Analysis of the Supply Chain Components
Doliente, S. S., Narayan, A., Tapia, J. F. D., Samsatli, N. J., Zhao, Y., & Samsatli, S. (2020) · Frontiers in Energy Research · doi:10.3389/fenrg.2020.00110 · Cited by 295 · see citing works
- Authors
- Liati, A., Schreiber, D., Alpert, P. A., Liao, Y., Brem, B. T., Corral Arroyo, P., Hu, J., Jonsdottir, H. R., Ammann, M., & Dimopoulos Eggenschwiler, P.
- Affiliations
- Empa (CH)
- Paul Scherrer Institute (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Liati, A.
- Venue
- Environmental Pollution
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 247
- Pages
- 658-667
- ISSN
- 0269-7491 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2912111270
- Cited by
- 75
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 4.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Environmental Pollution (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DORA PSI (Paul Scherrer Institute) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- DORA Empa (Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (Empa)) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Swiss Federal Office of Civil Aviation (SFLV 2015-113)
- Swiss National Science Foundation (163074)
- Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant (701647)
- German Ministry für Bildung und Forschung (05KS4WE1/6, 05KSWE)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes › Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
- Keywords
- biofuels, hydroprocessed esters and fatty acids, Jet A-1, soot reactivity, soot morphology, turbofan engine exhaust, airport air quality, amorphous shell, kerosene
- MeSH terms
- Air Pollutants, Air Pollution, Aircraft, Vehicle Emissions, Hydrocarbons, Kerosene, Spectrum Analysis, X-Rays, Microscopy, Electron, Transmission, Soot, Biofuels
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review