Recent advances in toxicological research of nanoplastics in the environment: A review
Abstract
Nanoplastics have attracted increasing attention in recent years due to their widespread existence in the environment and the potential adverse effects on living organisms. In this paper, the toxic effects of nanoplastics on organisms were systematically reviewed. The translocation and absorption of nanoplastics, as well as the release of additives and contaminants adsorbed on nanoplastics in the organism body were discussed, and the potential adverse effects of nanoplastics on human health were evaluated. Nanoplastics can be ingested by organisms, be accumulated in their body and be transferred along the food chains. Nanoplastics showed effects on the growth, development and reproduction of organisms, and disturbing the normal metabolism. The toxic effects on living organisms mainly depended on the surface chemical properties and the particle size of nanoplastics. Positively charged nanoplastics showed more significant effects on the normal physiological activity of cells than negatively charged nanoplastics, and smaller particle sized nanoplastics could more easily penetrate the cell membranes, hence, accumulated in tissues and cells. Additionally, the release of additives and contaminants adsorbed on nanoplastics in organism body poses more significant threats to organisms than nanoplastics themselves. However, there are still knowledge gaps in the determination and quantification of nanoplastics, as well as their contaminant release mechanisms, degradation rates and process from large plastics to nanoplastics, and the transportation of nanoplastics along food chains. These challenges would hinder the risk assessment of nanoplastics in the environment. It is necessary to further develop the risk assessment of nanoplastics and deeply investigate its toxicological effects.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The nanoscale size of plastics allows them to penetrate cellular membranes, disrupting growth, development, and metabolic processes in exposed organisms.
“The nanoscale size of these plastics allows them to easily penetrate cellular membranes, thereby disrupting growth, development, and metabolic processes in exposed organisms (Pedersen et al., 2020; Shen et al., 2019).”
From Deciphering the toxic effects of polystyrene nanoparticles on erythropoiesis at single-cell resolution (2025) · cites this paper as Shen et al., 2019
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 107 · Cited by 686
- Authors
- Shen, M., Zhang, Y., Zhu, Y., Song, B., Zeng, G., Hu, D., Wen, X., & Ren, X.
- Affiliations
- Hunan University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zeng, Guangming
- Venue
- Environmental Pollution
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-09
- Volume
- 252
- Issue
- Pt A
- Pages
- 511-521
- ISSN
- 0269-7491 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2946333424
- Cited by
- 686
- References
- 107
- Citations by year
- 2026: 63 · 2025: 103 · 2024: 124 · 2023: 133 · 2022: 120 · 2021: 88 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 6
- FWCI
- 2.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Environmental Pollution (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
- Keywords
- nanoplastics, nanoplastic toxicity, bioaccumulation, trophic transfer, particle size effects, surface charge, cell membrane penetration, human health risk, environmental risk assessment, nanoplastic quantification
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Daphnia, Humans, Nematoda, Particle Size, Plastics, Surface Properties, Food Chain, Bivalvia, Nanoparticles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review