Cited by 380Microplastics and Plastic PollutionEnvironmental Toxicology and EcotoxicologyPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts

What are the drivers of microplastic toxicity? Comparing the toxicity of plastic chemicals and particles to Daphnia magna

Open access
Zimmermann, Lisa, Göttlich, Sarah, Oehlmann, Jörg, Wagner, Martin, Völker, Carolin·2020·Environmental Pollution

Abstract

Given the ubiquitous presence of microplastics in aquatic environments, an evaluation of their toxicity is essential. Microplastics are a heterogeneous set of materials that differ not only in particle properties, like size and shape, but also in chemical composition, including polymers, additives and side products. Thus far, it remains unknown whether the plastic chemicals or the particle itself are the driving factor for microplastic toxicity. To address this question, we exposed Daphnia magna for 21 days to irregular polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polyurethane (PUR) and polylactic acid (PLA) microplastics as well as to natural kaolin particles in high concentrations (10, 50, 100, 500 mg/L, ≤ 59 μm) and different exposure scenarios, including microplastics and microplastics without extractable chemicals as well as the extracted and migrating chemicals alone. All three microplastic types negatively affected the life-history of D. magna. However, this toxicity depended on the endpoint and the material. While PVC had the largest effect on reproduction, PLA reduced survival most effectively. The latter indicates that bio-based and biodegradable plastics can be as toxic as their conventional counterparts. The natural particle kaolin was less toxic than microplastics when comparing numerical concentrations. Importantly, the contribution of plastic chemicals to the toxicity was also plastic type-specific. While we can attribute effects of PVC to the chemicals used in the material, effects of PUR and PLA plastics were induced by the mere particle. Our study demonstrates that plastic chemicals can drive microplastic toxicity. This highlights the importance of considering the individual chemical composition of plastics when assessing their environmental risks. Our results suggest that less studied polymer types, like PVC and PUR, as well as bioplastics are of particular toxicological relevance and should get a higher priority in ecotoxicological studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115392

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The uptake of microplastics has demonstrated potential to adversely affect organisms, but observed effects are nonuniform across levels of biological organization and are complicated by exposure concentration and particle characteristics.

    “The uptake of microplastics has demonstrated potential to adversely affect organisms; however, the effects observed in laboratory studies have been nonuniform across levels of biological organization and are further complicated by exposure concentration and both the physical characteristics and chemical composition of the particle (Bucci et al., 2020;Castro-Castellon et al., 2022;Zimmermann et al.”

    From No Effect of Realistic Concentrations of Polyester Microplastic Fibers on Freshwater Zooplankton Communities (2024) · cites this paper as Zimmermann et al., 2020

    The Introduction describes adverse effects of microplastics in aquatic species, and section 4.1 reports that effects in Daphnia magna vary by endpoint, polymer type, and exposure concentration. The paper also discusses physical and chemical differences among particles. It does not establish that uptake itself causes the effects or compare effects across levels of biological organization; its experiments assess life-history endpoints in one species. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 380

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. G€ ottermann, S., Bonten, C., Kloeppel, A., Kaiser, S., Brümme, F., 2015. Marine littering - effects and degradation. Conference paper "24. Stuttgarter Kunststoffkolloquium".
  2. OECD, 2004. Test No. 202: Daphnia sp. acute immobilisation test. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/ content/book/9789264069947-en. OECD, 2012. Test No. 211: Daphnia magna reproduction test 211. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris. https://www.oecd.org/ chemicalsafety/test-no-211-daphnia-magna-reproduction-test- 9789264185203-en.htm.

Authors
Zimmermann, L., Göttlich, S., Oehlmann, J., Wagner, M., & Völker, C.
Affiliations
  • Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
  • Institute for Social-Ecological Research (DE)
Corresponding author
Zimmermann, Lisa
Venue
Environmental Pollution
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-12
Volume
267
Pages
115392
ISSN
0269-7491 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3054256347
Cited by
380
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 66 · 2024: 83 · 2023: 71 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 4
FWCI
11.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Pollution (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Publication Server of Goethe University Frankfurt am Main (Goethe University Frankfurt) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
Keywords
microplastic toxicity, Daphnia magna, polyvinyl chloride, polyurethane, polylactic acid, bioplastics, polymer additives, chemical migration, kaolin particles, reproduction, survival, aquatic ecotoxicology, environmental risk assessment
MeSH terms
Microplastics, Animals, Daphnia, Plastics, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Ecotoxicology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review