Cited by 33Heavy Metal Exposure and ToxicityHeavy metals in environmentMercury impact and mitigation studies

IQ alteration induced by lead in developed and underdeveloped/developing countries: A systematic review and a meta-analysis

Galiciolli, Maria Eduarda A., Lima, Luíza Siqueira, da Costa, Nayara de Souza, de Andrade, Diancarlos P., Irioda, Ana C., Oliveira, Cláudia S.·2022·Environmental Pollution

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of Pb exposure on full-scale IQ score in pediatric subjects. Following PRISMA guidelines, the data from January 2010 to April 2020 were systematically searched and collected on electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Embase). The eligibility criteria included cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies that were published in English, from 2010 to 2020, that analyzed the blood Pb levels of pediatric subjects (0-19 years) and possible changes in the full-scale IQ score. In this study, 2174 scientific papers were collected from three electronic databases. From those, 726 were duplicates and 1421 were excluded because they did not meet the eligibility criteria, resulting in a total of 27 papers, from which, seven were used to perform the meta-analysis. The 27 scientific papers systematically selected for this study were separated by the country where the study was realized in developed and underdeveloped/developing countries. In the underdeveloped/developing countries the blood Pb levels are higher and showed a greater variation (1.30-11.66 μgPb/dL of blood) than in countries with higher development index (0.57-4.80 μgPb/dL of blood). The full-scale IQ score are inversely proportional to the blood Pb values, and it is possible to see that in the underdeveloped/developing countries the full-scale IQ score showed lower values and greater variation (59.2-111) compared to the individuals from developed countries (91.9-114.5).…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118316

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Galiciolli, M. E. A., Lima, L. S., da Costa, N. D. S., de Andrade, D. P., Irioda, A. C., & Oliveira, C. S.
Corresponding author
Oliveira, Cláudia S.
Venue
Environmental Pollution
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-01
Volume
292
Issue
Pt A
Pages
118316
ISSN
0269-7491 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3207300082
Cited by
33
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10
FWCI
0.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Pollution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Mercury impact and mitigation studies
Keywords
lead exposure, blood lead levels, Full Scale IQ, cognitive development, children, developing countries, developed countries, environmental contamination, lead poisoning prevention
MeSH terms
Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Developing Countries, Environmental Pollution, Humans, Intelligence, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review