Cited by 48Waste Management and RecyclingMunicipal Solid Waste ManagementMicroplastics and Plastic Pollution

A review on takeaway packaging waste: Types, ecological impact, and disposal route

Zhuo, Yu, He, JinTao, Li, Wen, Deng, Jing, Lin, QinLu·2023·Environmental Pollution

Abstract

Rapid economic growth and urbanization have led to significant changes in the world's consumption patterns. Accelerated urbanization, the spread of the mobile Internet, and the increasing pace of work globally have all contributed to the demand for the food takeaway industry. The rapid development of the takeaway industry inevitably brings convenience to life, and with it comes great environmental pressure from waste packaging materials. While maintaining the convenience of people's lives, further reducing the environmental pollution caused by takeaway packaging materials and promoting the recycling and reuse of takeaway packaging waste need to attract the attention and concern of the whole society. This review systematically and comprehensively introduces common takeaway food types and commonly used packaging materials, analyzes the impacts of discarded takeaway packaging materials on human health and the ecological environment, summarizes the formulation and implementation of relevant policies and regulations, proposes treatment methods and resourceful reuse pathways for discarded takeaway packaging, and also provides an outlook on the development of green takeaway packaging. Currently, only 20% of waste packaging materials are recycled worldwide, and there is still a need to develop more green takeaway packaging materials and continuously improve relevant policies and regulations to promote the sustainable development of the takeaway industry. The review is conducive to fu…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.122518

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhuo, Y., He, J., Li, W., Deng, J., & Lin, Q.
Affiliations
Central South University of Forestry and Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Li, Wen
Venue
Environmental Pollution
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-11
Volume
337
Pages
122518
ISSN
0269-7491 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386439539
Cited by
48
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Pollution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Waste Management and Recycling
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
Keywords
packaging waste, food packaging materials, packaging recycling, reusable packaging, environmental impact of packaging, human health risk, sustainable packaging, resource recovery
MeSH terms
Sustainable Development, Environment, Environmental Pollution, Humans, Industry, Waste Management, Food Packaging, Product Packaging, Recycling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review