Cited by 163Air Quality and Health ImpactsEnvironmental Justice and Health DisparitiesHealth, Environment, Cognitive Aging

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Residential mobility during pregnancy and the potential for ambient air pollution exposure misclassification

Abstract

Studies of environmental exposures and adverse birth outcomes often rely on maternal address at birth obtained from the birth certificate to classify exposure. Although the gestational age of interest is often early pregnancy, maternal addresses are not available for women who move during pregnancy when using maternal addresses abstracted from birth certificates. The aim of this study was to explore the extent of ambient air pollutant exposure misclassification due to maternal residential mobility during pregnancy among the subgroup of a New York birth cohort. The authors obtained the maternal addresses at birth from the New York Birth Certificate, and the maternal addresses by gestational age from the National Birth Defect Prevention Study for New York participants for the study period 1997-2002. Among the 1324 mothers, 172 (13.0%) moved once during pregnancy and 46 (3.5%) moved at least twice. When accounting for multiple addresses among some individuals, of the 218 mothers who moved, 38 (2.9%) moved in the 3rd to 8th weeks after conception (critical period, not exclusive from the 1st trimester), 80 (6.0%) moved in the 1st trimester, 112 (8.5%) in the 2nd trimester, and 51 (3.9%) in the 3rd trimester. Air monitoring data from the New York Department of Environmental Conservation were used as surrogates to compute the ambient ozone and PM(10) exposures for mothers with complete residential data. This study estimates exposure using maternal address at birth obtained from birt…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envres.2009.11.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Bell, 2007, Ambient air pollution and low birth weight in Connecticut and Massachusetts, Environ. Health Perspect., 15, 1118, 10.1289/ehp.9759 · DOI
  2. Canfield, 2006, Residential mobility patterns and exposure misclassification in epidemiologic studies of birth defects, J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol., 16, 538, 10.1038/sj.jes.7500501 · DOI
  3. Chen, 2002, Air pollution and birth weight in northern Nevada, 1991–1999, Inhal. Toxicol., 14, 141, 10.1080/089583701753403962 · DOI
  4. Dugandzic, R., Dodds, L., Stieb, D., Smith-Doiron, M., 2006. The association between low level exposures to ambient air pollution and term low birth weight: a retrospective cohort study. Environ. Health doi:10.1186/1476-069X-5-3 (17 February 2006). · DOI
  5. Fell, 2004, Residential mobility during pregnancy, Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol., 18, 408, 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2004.00580.x · DOI
  6. Gilboa, 2005, Relation between ambient air quality and selected birth defects, seven county study, Texas, 1997–2000, Am. J. Epidemiol., 162, 238, 10.1093/aje/kwi189 · DOI
  7. Gouveia, 2004, Association between ambient air pollution and birth weight in Sao Paulo, Brazil, J. Epidemiol. Commun. Health, 58, 11, 10.1136/jech.58.1.11 · DOI
  8. Hansen, 2006, Maternal exposure to low levels of ambient air pollution and preterm birth in Brisbane, Australia, BJOG, 113, 935, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01010.x · DOI
  9. Hansen, 2007, Low levels of ambient air pollution during pregnancy and fetal growth among term neonates in Brisbane, Australia, Environ. Res., 103, 383, 10.1016/j.envres.2006.06.010 · DOI
  10. Huynh, 2006, Relationships between air pollution and preterm birth in Californi, Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol., 20, 454, 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2006.00759.x · DOI
  11. Hwang, 2008, Ozone and other air pollutants and the risk of oral clefts, Environ. Health Perspect., 116, 1411, 10.1289/ehp.11311 · DOI
  12. Khoury, 1988, Residential mobility during pregnancy: implications for environmental teratogenesis, J. Clin. Epidemiol., 41, 15, 10.1016/0895-4356(88)90004-2 · DOI
  13. Lee, 2003, Exposure to air pollution during different gestational phases contributes to risks of low birth weight, Hum. Reprod., 18, 638, 10.1093/humrep/deg102 · DOI
  14. Lin, 2004, Increased risks of term low-birth-weight infants in a petrochemical industrial city with high air pollution levels, Arch. Environ. Health, 59, 663, 10.1080/00039890409602951 · DOI
  15. Lin, 2008, Ambient ozone concentration and hospital admissions due to childhood respiratory diseases in New York State, 1991–2001, Environ. Res., 108, 42, 10.1016/j.envres.2008.06.007 · DOI
  16. Liu, 2007, Association between maternal exposure to ambient air pollutants during pregnancy and fetal growth restriction, J. Exp. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol., 17, 426, 10.1038/sj.jes.7500503 · DOI
  17. Liu, 2003, Association between gaseous ambient air pollutants and adverse pregnancy outcomes in Vancouver, Canada, Environ. Health Perspect., 111, 1773, 10.1289/ehp.6251 · DOI
  18. Maisonet, 2001, Relation between ambient air pollution and low birth weight in the Northeastern United States, Environ. Health Perspect., 109
  19. Maroziene, L., Grazuleviciene, R., et al. 2002. Maternal exposure to low-level air pollution and pregnancy outcomes: a population-based study. Environmental Health (9 December 2002). · DOI
  20. Medeiros, 2005, Relationship between low birthweight and air pollution in the city of Sao Paulo, Brazil, Revista de Saude Publica, 39, 965, 10.1590/S0034-89102005000600015 · DOI
  21. Rankin, 2009, Maternal exposure to ambient air pollutants and risk of congenital anomalies, Environ. Res., 109, 181, 10.1016/j.envres.2008.11.007 · DOI
  22. Ritz, 2006, Air pollution and infant death in Southern California, 1989–2000, Pediatrics, 118, 493, 10.1542/peds.2006-0027 · DOI
  23. Ritz, 2002, Ambient air pollution and risk of birth defects in Southern California, Am. J. Epidemiol., 155, 17, 10.1093/aje/155.1.17 · DOI
  24. Ritz, 2007, Ambient air pollution and preterm birth in the environment and pregnancy outcomes study at the University of California, Los Angeles, Am. J. Epidemiol., 166, 1045, 10.1093/aje/kwm181 · DOI
  25. Ritz, 2000, Effect of air pollution on preterm birth among children born in Southern California between 1989 and 1993, Epidemiology, 11, 502, 10.1097/00001648-200009000-00004 · DOI
  26. Rogers, J.F., Dunlop, A.L., 2006. Air pollution and very low birth weight infants: a target population? Pediatrics 118, 156–164. · DOI
  27. Sagiv, 2004, Air pollution and risk for preterm birth in Pennsylvania, 1997–2001: a time series approach, Am. J. Epidemiol., 159, S84
  28. Salam, 2005, Birth outcomes and prenatal exposure to ozone, carbon monoxide, and particulate matter: results from the Children’s Health Study, Environ. Health Perspect., 113, 1638, 10.1289/ehp.8111 · DOI
  29. Schulman, 1993, Exposure misclassification due to residential mobility during pregnancy in epidemiologic investigations of congenital malformations, Arch. Environ. Health, 48, 114, 10.1080/00039896.1993.9938404 · DOI
  30. Shaw, 1992, Residential mobility during pregnancy for mothers of infants with or without congenital cardiac anomalies: a reprint, Arch. Environ. Health, 47, 236, 10.1080/00039896.1992.9938355 · DOI
  31. Strickland, 2009, Ambient air pollution and cardiovascular malformations in Atlanta, Georgia, 1986–2003, Am. J. Epidemiol., 169, 1004, 10.1093/aje/kwp011 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Suh, 2008, Different effects of PM(10) exposure on preterm birth by gestational period estimated from time-dependent survival analyses, Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health, 82, 613, 10.1007/s00420-008-0380-7 · DOI
  33. Wilhelm, 2003, Residential proximity to traffic and adverse birth outcomes in Los Angeles County, California, 1994–1996, Environ. Health Perspect., 111, 207, 10.1289/ehp.5688 · DOI
  34. Wilhelm, 2005, Local variations in CO and particulate air pollution and adverse birth outcomes in Los Angeles County, California, USA, Environ. Health Perspect., 113, 1212, 10.1289/ehp.7751 · DOI
  35. Woodruff, 2006, Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) air pollution and selected causes of postneonatal infant mortality in California, Environ. Health Perspect., 114, 786, 10.1289/ehp.8484 · DOI
  36. Yang, 2003, Effects of air pollution on birth weight among children born between 1995 and 1997 in Kaohsiung, Taiwan, J. Toxicol. Environ. Health—Part A, 66, 807, 10.1080/15287390306385 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–154 of 154

Metadata

Authors
Chen, L., Bell, E. M., Caton, A. R., Druschel, C. M., & Lin, S.
Affiliations
  • New York State Department of Health (US)
  • University at Albany, State University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Chen, Lei
Venue
Environmental Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-02
Volume
110
Issue
2
Pages
162-168
ISSN
0013-9351 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2040468712
Cited by
163
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
FWCI
4.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Public Health Service (U50/CCU223184)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
Keywords
ambient air pollution exposure, exposure misclassification, maternal interview, ozone exposure, PM10 exposure, birth cohort
MeSH terms
Congenital Abnormalities, Adult, Air Pollutants, Birth Certificates, Environmental Exposure, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, New York, Ozone, Population Dynamics, Pregnancy, Cohort Studies, Maternal Exposure, Particulate Matter, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review