Extreme air pollution events from bushfires and dust storms and their association with mortality in Sydney, Australia 1994–2007
Open accessAbstract
Introduction Extreme air pollution events due to bushfire smoke and dust storms are expected to increase as a consequence of climate change, yet little has been published about their population health impacts. We examined the association between air pollution events and mortality in Sydney from 1997 to 2004. Methods Events were defined as days for which the 24h city-wide concentration of PM(10) exceeded the 99th percentile. All events were researched and categorised as being caused by either smoke or dust. We used a time-stratified case-crossover design with conditional logistic regression modelling adjusted for influenza epidemics, same day and lagged temperature and humidity. Reported odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals are for mortality on event days compared with non-event days. The contribution of elevated average temperatures to mortality during smoke events was explored. Results There were 52 event days, 48 attributable to bushfire smoke, six to dust and two affected by both. Smoke events were associated with a 5% increase in non-accidental mortality at a lag of 1 day OR (95% confidence interval (CI)) 1.05 (95%CI: 1.00-1.10). When same day temperature was removed from the model, additional same day associations were observed with non-accidental mortality OR 1.05 (95%CI: 1.00-1.09), and with cardiovascular mortality OR (95%CI) 1.10 (95%CI: 1.00-1.20). Dust events were associated with a 15% increase in non-accidental mortality at a lag of 3 days, OR (95%CI) 1.16 (95%CI: 1.03-1.30). Conclusions The magnitude and temporal patterns of association with mortality were different for smoke and dust events. Public health advisories during bushfire smoke pollution episodes should include advice about hot weather in addition to air pollution.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The concept of wildfire wave defined in this study is similar to concepts of extreme air pollution events from wildfires defined in previous studies.
“The concept of wildfire wave defined in our study is similar to the concepts of extreme air pollution events from wildfires defined in previous studies11,15.”
From Health impacts of wildfire-related air pollution in Brazil: a nationwide study of more than 2 million hospital admissions between 2008 and 2018 (2021) · cites this paper as [15]
Cites
The Case-Crossover Design: A Method for Studying Transient Effects on the Risk of Acute Events
Maclure, M. (1991) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115853 · Cited by 2,327 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Climate Extremes and Compound Hazards in a Warming World
AghaKouchak, A., Chiang, F., Huning, L. S., Love, C. A., Mallakpour, I., Mazdiyasni, O., Moftakhari, H., Papalexiou, S. M., Ragno, E., & Sadegh, M. (2020) · Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences · doi:10.1146/annurev-earth-071719-055228 · Cited by 1,103 · see citing works
A systematic review of the physical health impacts from non-occupational exposure to wildfire smoke
Liu, J. C., Pereira, G., Uhl, S. A., Bravo, M. A., & Bell, M. L. (2015) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2014.10.015 · Cited by 685 · see citing works
Finlay, S. E., Moffat, A., Gazzard, R., Baker, D., & Murray, V. (2012) · PLoS Currents · doi:10.1371/4f959951cce2c · Cited by 226 · see citing works
Requia, W. J., Amini, H., Mukherjee, R., Gold, D. R., & Schwartz, J. D. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26822-7 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Measures of forest fire smoke exposure and their associations with respiratory health outcomes
Henderson, S. B., & Johnston, F. H. (2012) · Current Opinion in Allergy & Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1097/aci.0b013e328353351f · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Johnston, F., Hanigan, I., Henderson, S., Morgan, G., & Bowman, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Tasmania (AU)
- Australian National University (AU)
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Johnston, Fay
- Venue
- Environmental Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-08
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 811-816
- ISSN
- 0013-9351 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1987247518
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 10.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Locations
- Environmental Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
- Environmental Research
- Funders
- National Health and Medical Research Council (490057)
- Australian Research Council (LP0882048)
- New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Climate Change and Health Impacts
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
- Keywords
- bushfire smoke, dust storms, mortality, particulate matter, PM10, non-accidental mortality, cardiovascular mortality, temperature-mortality relationship, public health advisories, Sydney
- MeSH terms
- Air Pollutants, Air Pollution, Dust, Fires, Hot Temperature, Humans, Mortality, New South Wales, Public Health
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review