Cited by 30Asthma and respiratory diseasesAllergic Rhinitis and SensitizationOccupational exposure and asthma

Chlorinated pool attendance, airway epithelium defects and the risks of allergic diseases in adolescents: Interrelationships revealed by circulating biomarkers

Bernard, Alfred, Nickmilder, Marc, Dumont, Xavier·2015·Environmental Research

Abstract

It has been suggested that allergic diseases might be epithelial disorders driven by various environmental stressors but the epidemiological evidence supporting this concept is limited. In a cross-sectional study of 835 school adolescents (365 boys; mean age, 15.5 yr), we measured the serum concentrations of Club cell protein (CC16), surfactant-associated protein D (SP-D) and of total and aeroallergen-specific IgE. We used the serum CC16/SP-D concentration ratio as an index integrating changes in the permeability (SP-D) and secretory function (CC16) of the airway epithelium. In both sexes, early swimming in chlorinated pools emerged as the most consistent and strongest predictor of low CC16 and CC16/SP-D ratio in serum. Among girls, a low CC16/SP-D ratio was associated with increased odds (lowest vs. highest tertile) for pet sensitization (OR 2.97, 95% CI 1.19-8.22) and for hay fever in subjects sensitized to pollen (OR 4.12, 95% CI 1.28-14.4). Among boys, a low CC16/SP-D ratio was associated with increased odds for house-dust mite (HDM) sensitization (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.11-3.73), for allergic rhinitis in subjects sensitized to HDM (OR 3.52, 95% CI 1.22-11.1) and for asthma in subjects sensitized to any aeroallergen (OR 3.38, 95% CI 1.17-11.0), HDM (OR 5.20, 95% CI 1.40-24.2) or pollen (OR 5.82, 95% CI 1.51-27.4). Odds for allergic sensitization or rhinitis also increased with increasing SP-D or decreasing CC16 in serum. Our findings support the hypothesis linking the developm…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envres.2015.03.034

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Bernard, A., Nickmilder, M., & Dumont, X.
Affiliations
UCLouvain (BE)
Corresponding author
Bernard, Alfred
Venue
Environmental Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-07
Volume
140
Pages
119-126
ISSN
0013-9351 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007609035
Cited by
30
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (submittedVersion)
Funders
French Agency for the Safety of the Work and Environment
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational exposure and asthma
Keywords
airway epithelium, epithelial barrier dysfunction, allergic diseases, CC16, allergen sensitization, allergic rhinitis, asthma, house dust mite sensitization, pollen sensitization, adolescents, environmental exposure
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Belgium, Bronchi, Chlorine, Cross-Sectional Studies, Environmental Exposure, Epithelium, Female, Humans, Hypersensitivity, Immunoglobulin E, Male, Risk Factors, Swimming Pools, Trachea, Biomarkers, Chemokines, CC, Pulmonary Surfactant-Associated Protein D

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review