Cited by 16Air Quality and Health ImpactsFolate and B Vitamins ResearchHealth, Environment, Cognitive Aging

Prenatal particulate air pollution exposure and cord blood homocysteine in newborns: Results from the ENVIRONAGE birth cohort

Abstract

Introduction Particulate air pollution is probably causally related to increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Plasma homocysteine is an established cardiovascular disease risk factor. Recent studies show that exposure to particulate air pollution is associated with plasma homocysteine levels in adults but no studies on the association between prenatal air pollution and neonatal homocysteine levels exist. Methods In 609 newborns of the ENVIRONAGE (ENVIRonmental influence ON early AGEing) birth cohort, we investigated the association between prenatal particulate matter exposure with a diameter ≤ 2.5 µm (PM 2.5 ) and cord plasma homocysteine levels, and in a subset (n = 490) we studied the interaction with 11 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs) in oxidative stress-related genes (CAT, COMT, GSTP1, SOD2, NQO1 and HFE), through multiple linear regression. PM 2.5 levels were obtained using a high resolution spatial temporal interpolation method. Homocysteine levels were measured by the homocysteine enzymatic assay on a Roche/Hitachi cobas c system. SNPs were assessed on the Biotrove OpenArray SNP genotyping platform. Results In multivariable-adjusted models, cord plasma homocysteine levels were 8.1% higher (95% CI: 1.9 to 14.3%; p = 0.01) for each 5 µg/m³ increment in average PM 2.5 exposure during the entire pregnancy. With regard to pregnancy trimesters, there was only an association in the 2 nd trimester: 3.6% (95% CI: 0.9% to 6.4%; p = 0.01). The positive association betwee…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envres.2018.08.032

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hogervorst, J. G. F., Madhloum, N., Saenen, N. D., Janssen, B. G., Penders, J., Vanpoucke, C., De Vivo, I., Vrijens, K., & Nawrot, T. S.
Affiliations
  • Hasselt University (BE)
  • Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg (BE)
Corresponding author
Hogervorst, Janneke G.F.
Venue
Environmental Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-01
Volume
168
Pages
507-513
ISSN
0013-9351 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2889467868
Cited by
16
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3
FWCI
0.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Document Server@UHasselt (UHasselt) (submittedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Research Council (ERC-2012-StG310898)
  • Flemish Scientific Fund Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO, 1516112N/G.0873.11.N.10)
  • Research Foundation – Flanders (12J9516N, 12D7714N)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Folate and B Vitamins Research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
Keywords
prenatal air pollution exposure, particulate matter PM2.5, neonates, oxidative stress, gene-environment interaction, single nucleotide polymorphisms, manganese superoxide dismutase, glutathione S-transferase pi, catalase, cardiovascular risk, ENVIRONAGE birth cohort
MeSH terms
Adult, Air Pollutants, Air Pollution, Female, Fetal Blood, Homocysteine, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Pregnancy, Maternal Exposure, Particulate Matter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review