Cited by 37Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental StudiesMicrobial bioremediation and biosurfactantsPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts

Synergistic insights into pesticide persistence and microbial dynamics for bioremediation

Abstract

Rampant use of fertilizers and pesticides for boosting agricultural crop productivity has proven detrimental impact on land, water, and air quality globally. Although fertilizers and pesticides ensure greater food security, their unscientific management negatively impacts soil fertility, structure of soil microbiome and ultimately human health and hygiene. Pesticides exert varying impacts on soil properties and microbial community functions, contingent on factors such as their chemical structure, mode of action, toxicity, and dose-response characteristics. The diversity of bacterial responses to different pesticides presents a valuable opportunity for pesticide remediation. In this context, OMICS technologies are currently under development, and notable advancements in gene editing, including CRISPR technologies, have facilitated bacterial engineering, opening promising avenues for reducing toxicity and enhancing biological remediation. This paper provides a holistic overview of pesticide dynamics, with a specific focus on organophosphate, organochlorine, and pyrethroids. It covers their occurrence, activity, and potential mitigation strategies, with an emphasis on the microbial degradation route. Subsequently, the pesticide degradation pathways, associated genes and regulatory mechanisms, associated OMICS approaches in soil microbes with a special emphasis on CRISPR/Cas9 are also being discussed. Here, we analyze key environmental factors that significantly impact pesticide…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envres.2024.119290

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Ray, S. S., Parihar, K., Goyal, N., & Mahapatra, D. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Petroleum and Energy Studies (IN)
  • Uttaranchal University (IN)
  • Oregon State University (US)
Corresponding author
Goyal, Nishu
Venue
Environmental Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-09
Volume
257
Pages
119290
ISSN
0013-9351 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4399242559
Cited by
37
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 3
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactants
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
Keywords
pesticide persistence, soil microbial communities, bioremediation, organophosphates, organochlorine pesticides, pyrethroid insecticides, soil microbiome, CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing, bacterial engineering, pesticide alternatives
MeSH terms
Bacteria, Biodegradation, Environmental, Pesticides, Soil Microbiology, Soil Pollutants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review