CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 89

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The meaning of system robustness for flood risk management

Mens, Marjolein J.P., Klijn, Frans, de Bruijn, Karin M., van Beek, Eelco·2011·Environmental Science & Policy
DOI 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.08.003
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.08.003

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Adger, 2006, Vulnerability, Global Environmental Change, 16, 268, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Bankes, 1993, Exploratory modeling for policy analysis, Operations Research, 41
  3. Beekman, A.A., Schuiling, R., 1927. School atlas der Geheele Aarde (English: School Atlas of the Entire Earth). Uitgeverij Thieme, Zutphen.
  4. Carpenter, 2001, From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to what, Ecosystems, 4, 765, 10.1007/s10021-001-0045-9 · DOI
  5. Carlson, 2002, Complexity and robustness, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99, 2538, 10.1073/pnas.012582499 · DOI
  6. De Bruijn, 2004, Resilience and flood risk management, Water Policy, 6, 53, 10.2166/wp.2004.0004 · DOI
  7. De Bruijn, 2004, Resilience indicators for flood risk management systems of lowland rivers, International Journal of River Basin Management, 2, 199, 10.1080/15715124.2004.9635232 · DOI
  8. De Bruijn, K.M., 2005. Resilience and flood risk management. A systems approach applied to lowland rivers. Ph.D. thesis. Technical University Delft, Delft, the Netherlands.
  9. Dow, 1992, Exploring differences in our common future(s): the meaning of vulnerability to global environmental change, Geoforum, 23, 417, 10.1016/0016-7185(92)90052-6 · DOI
  10. Egorova, 2008, Uncertainty in flood damage estimation, International Journal of River Basin Management, 6, 139, 10.1080/15715124.2008.9635343 · DOI
  11. Gallopin, 2006, Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity, Global Environmental Change, 16, 293, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.004 · DOI
  12. Hall, 2008, A framework for uncertainty analysis in flood risk management decisions, International Journal of River Basin Management, 6, 85, 10.1080/15715124.2008.9635339 · DOI
  13. Holling, 1973, Resilience and stability of ecological systems, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, 1, 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Kates, 2006, Reconstruction of New Orleans after hurricane Katrina: a research perspective, PNAS, 103., 10.1073/pnas.0605726103 · DOI
  15. Klijn, 2004, Flood-risk management strategies for an uncertain future: living with Rhine river floods in the Netherlands?, Ambio, 33, 141, 10.1579/0044-7447-33.3.141 · DOI
  16. Lempert, R., Popper, S.W., Bankes, S.C., 2003. Shaping the Next One Hundred Years: New Methods for Quantitative, Long-Term Policy Analysis. RAND, Santa Monica. · DOI
  17. Marchand, M., 2009. Modelling coastal vulnerability. Design and evaluation of a vulnerability model for tropical storms and floods. Ph.D. thesis. Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands.
  18. Merz, 2010, Fluvial flood risk management in a changing world, Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 10, 509, 10.5194/nhess-10-509-2010 · DOI
  19. Rosenhead, 1972, Robustness and optimality as criteria for strategic decisions, Operational Research Quarterly, 23, 413, 10.1057/jors.1972.72 · DOI
  20. Scheffer, 2001, Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems, Nature, 413, 591, 10.1038/35098000 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Scheffer, 2003, Catastrophic regime shifts in ecosystems: linking theory to observation, Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 18, 10.1016/j.tree.2003.09.002 · DOI
  22. Stelling, 2004, Robustness of cellular functions, Cell, 118, 675, 10.1016/j.cell.2004.09.008 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Turner, 2003, A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science, Proceedings of the national academy of science, 100, 8074, 10.1073/pnas.1231335100 · DOI
  24. Walker, 2004, Thresholds in ecological and social–ecological systems: a developing database, Ecology and Society, 9, 3, 10.5751/ES-00664-090203 · DOI
  25. Wardekker, 2010, Operationalising a resilience approach to adapting an urban delta to uncertain climate changes, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77, 987, 10.1016/j.techfore.2009.11.005 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 89

Metadata

Authors
Mens, M. J. P., Klijn, F., de Bruijn, K. M., & van Beek, E.
Venue
Environmental Science & Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-12
Volume
14
Issue
8
Pages
1121-1131
ISSN
1462-9011
DOI
10.1016/j.envsci.2011.08.003
Cited by
89
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review