The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bridging the gap between ecosystem service assessments and land-use planning through Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ADAPTIVE GOVERNANCE OF SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS
Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511 · Cited by 5,814
Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning
Gómez-Baggethun, E., & Barton, D. N. (2013) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.019 · Cited by 1,871
Self-citationGovernance and the Capacity to Manage Resilience in Regional Social-Ecological Systems
Lebel, L., Anderies, J. M., Campbell, B., Folke, C., Hatfield-Dodds, S., Hughes, T. P., & Wilson, J. (2006) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-01606-110119 · Cited by 1,377
Urbanization, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Challenges and Opportunities: A Global Assessment
(2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7088-1 · Cited by 1,343
Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services
Hein, L., van Koppen, K., de Groot, R. S., & van Ierland, E. C. (2006) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.005 · Cited by 1,291
A Quantitative Review of Urban Ecosystem Service Assessments: Concepts, Models, and Implementation
Haase, D., Larondelle, N., Andersson, E., Artmann, M., Borgström, S., Breuste, J., Gomez-Baggethun, E., Gren, Å., Hamstead, Z., Hansen, R., et al. (2014) · AMBIO · doi:10.1007/s13280-014-0504-0 · Cited by 1,110
Self-citationBraat, L. C., & de Groot, R. (2012) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.011 · Cited by 1,063
Ecosystem services: From eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder
Norgaard, R. B. (2010) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.009 · Cited by 1,011
Bishop, J., ten Brink, P., Gundimeda, H., Kumar, P., Neßhöver, C., Schröter‐Schlaack, C., Simmons, B., Sukhdev, P., & Wittmer, H. (2010) · Cited by 971
Benefits of restoring ecosystem services in urban areas
Elmqvist, T., Setälä, H., Handel, S., van der Ploeg, S., Aronson, J., Blignaut, J., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Nowak, D., Kronenberg, J., & de Groot, R. (2015) · Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2015.05.001 · Cited by 895
Self-citation
Cited by
Assessing how green space types affect ecosystem services delivery in Porto, Portugal
Graça, M., Alves, P., Gonçalves, J., Nowak, D. J., Hoehn, R., Farinha-Marques, P., & Cunha, M. (2018) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.10.007 · Cited by 97
Nastran, M., Pintar, M., Železnikar, Š., & Cvejić, R. (2022) · Land · doi:10.3390/land11020299 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Langemeyer, J., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Haase, D., Scheuer, S., & Elmqvist, T.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-08
- Volume
- 62
- Pages
- 45-56
- ISSN
- 1462-9011 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2289251799
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 67
- FWCI
- 19.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bridging the gap between ecosystem service assessments and land-use planning through Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.02.013
- The paper
- Langemeyer, J., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Haase, D., Scheuer, S., & Elmqvist, T. (2016). Bridging the gap between ecosystem service assessments and land-use planning through Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA). Environmental Science & Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.02.013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
