Cited by 318Water-Energy-Food Nexus StudiesWater Governance and InfrastructureInterdisciplinary Research and Collaboration

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.

Anatomy of a buzzword: The emergence of ‘the water-energy-food nexus’ in UK natural resource debates

Open access
Cairns, Rose, Krzywoszynska, Anna·2016·Environmental Science & Policy

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.07.007

Cites

68 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 74 references

5 of the 74 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Bonn2011 Conference, 2011
  2. Hoff, 2011, Understanding the nexus background paper for the bonn 2011 conference
  3. Rist, 2013, Development as a buzzword development gilbert rist, Dev. Pract., 17, 485, 10.1080/09614520701469328 · DOI
  4. Stirling, 2014, Disciplinary dilemma: working across research silos is harder than it looks, Guard. Sci. Policy Blog.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 318

Metadata

Authors
Cairns, R., & Krzywoszynska, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Sussex (GB)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
Corresponding author
Krzywoszynska, Anna
Venue
Environmental Science & Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-10
Volume
64
Pages
164-170
ISSN
1462-9011 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2485702452
Cited by
317
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 1
FWCI
19.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Policy (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • Sussex Research Online (University of Sussex) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
ESRC as part of the ESRC Nexus Network
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Water Governance and Infrastructure
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
Keywords
water-energy-food nexus, buzzwords, natural resource policy, integration, power relations, transdisciplinary research, science-policy interface, efficiency improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review