The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Digital transformation and environmental sustainability in industry: Putting expectations in Asian and African policies into perspective
Open accessAbstract
With the increasing use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in industrial production, the risks and opportunities of these technologies for environmental sustainability as well as political awareness about these risks and opportunities become increasingly important. In this paper we analysed digital and industrial policies of four Sub-Saharan African countries (South Africa, Rwanda, Kenya, Nigeria) and three East Asian and Pacific countries (China, Thailand, Philippines) regarding their expectations about the impacts of ICTs in industry for environmental sustainability. We built on existing frameworks for the assessment of ICTs that distinguish between direct environmental effects which occur during the lifecycle of ICTs and indirect environmental effects which result from the application of ICTs in a variety of production processes and economic activities. We used qualitative content analysis to explore and analyse policy expectations regarding both direct and indirect environmental impacts of ICTs in industry. Our analysis showed that policies express a broad range of vague expectations focusing more on positive indirect impacts of the use of ICTs, e.g. for enhanced energy efficiency and resource management, than on negative direct impacts of ICTs, e.g. electricity consumption of ICTs. Moreover, expectations differed between countries and there was no shared theme that emerged in all policies. We suggest that policies must go beyond awareness of selected opportunities towards the integration of a more systemic understanding of interlinked direct and indirect impacts and pursue targeted measures to employ ICTs as tools for environmentally sustainable industries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The qualitative content analysis process
Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x · Cited by 22,617
Additive manufacturing and sustainability: an exploratory study of the advantages and challenges
Ford, S., & Despeisse, M. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.150 · Cited by 1,889
E-waste: An assessment of global production and environmental impacts
Robinson, B. H. (2009) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.09.044 · Cited by 1,777
Toward a smart grid: power delivery for the 21st century
Massoud Amin, S., & Wollenberg, B. F. (2005) · IEEE Power and Energy Magazine · doi:10.1109/mpae.2005.1507024 · Cited by 1,630
A review of the circular economy in China: moving from rhetoric to implementation
Su, B., Heshmati, A., Geng, Y., & Yu, X. (2013) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.020 · Cited by 1,429
On Global Electricity Usage of Communication Technology: Trends to 2030
Andrae, A., & Edler, T. (2015) · Challenges · doi:10.3390/challe6010117 · Cited by 1,334
Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A. B., Jabbour, C. J. C., Godinho Filho, M., & Roubaud, D. (2018) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-018-2772-8 · Cited by 1,116
World Development Report, 2016: digital dividends
(2016) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.196952 · Cited by 966
Virtual power plant and system integration of distributed energy resources
Pudjianto, D., Ramsay, C., & Strbac, G. (2007) · IET Renewable Power Generation · doi:10.1049/iet-rpg:20060023 · Cited by 954
A global sustainability perspective on 3D printing technologies
Gebler, M., Schoot Uiterkamp, A. J. M., & Visser, C. (2014) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.08.033 · Cited by 950
Cited by
Martínez-Peláez, R., Ochoa-Brust, A., Rivera, S., Félix, V. G., Ostos, R., Brito, H., Félix, R. A., & Mena, L. J. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su151411221 · Cited by 553
Sustainability through digital transformation: A systematic literature review for research guidance
Guandalini, I. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.003 · Cited by 445
Edge computing for Industry 5.0: fundamental, applications and research challenges
Sharma, M., Tomar, A., & Hazra, A. (2024) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2024.3359297 · Cited by 312
Wang, J., Liu, Y., Wang, W., & Wu, H. (2023) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136954 · Cited by 303
Kurniawan, T. A., Dzarfan Othman, M. H., Hwang, G. H., & Gikas, P. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131911 · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Kunkel, S., & Matthess, M.
- Venue
- Environmental Science & Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-10
- Volume
- 112
- Pages
- 318-329
- ISSN
- 1462-9011 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3043623144
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 50
- FWCI
- 8.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Digital transformation and environmental sustainability in industry: Putting expectations in Asian and African policies into perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.022
- The paper
- Kunkel, S., & Matthess, M. (2020). Digital transformation and environmental sustainability in industry: Putting expectations in Asian and African policies into perspective. Environmental Science & Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.022
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.