The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Map Comparison Kit
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit
Cohen, J. (1968) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0026256 · Cited by 8,736
On the Theory of Scales of Measurement
Stevens, S. S. (1946) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.103.2684.677 · Cited by 4,761 · cited 2×
“All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2004.11.013 Software required: None Program language: Geonamica Program size: 17 MB Availability and cost: Available and free of charge Download from: http://www.rivm.nl/milieu/modellen or http://www.riks.nl/MCK/”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Cited by
Anthropogenic land use estimates for the Holocene – HYDE 3.2
Klein Goldewijk, K., Beusen, A., Doelman, J., & Stehfest, E. (2017) · Earth System Science Data · doi:10.5194/essd-9-927-2017 · Cited by 1,204
Morales, N. S., Fernández, I. C., & Baca-González, V. (2017) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.3093 · Cited by 464
Rai, V., & Robinson, S. A. (2015) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.04.014 · Cited by 335
Revisiting Kappa to account for change in the accuracy assessment of land-use change models
van Vliet, J., Bregt, A. K., & Hagen-Zanker, A. (2011) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.01.017 · Cited by 317
Haines-Young, R., Potschin, M., & Kienast, F. (2012) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.09.004 · Cited by 314
Metadata
- Authors
- Visser, H., & de Nijs, T.
- Venue
- Environmental Modelling & Software
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 346-358
- ISSN
- 1364-8152 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1970339185
- Cited by
- 370
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Map Comparison Kit. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.envsoft.2004.11.013
- The paper
- Visser, H., & de Nijs, T. (2006). The Map Comparison Kit. Environmental Modelling & Software. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2004.11.013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
