The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Selecting among five common modelling approaches for integrated environmental assessment and management
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2003) · doi:10.1201/9780429258480 · Cited by 27,276
Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture
Pretty, J. N. (1995) · World Development · doi:10.1016/0305-750x(95)00046-f · Cited by 1,753
Voinov, A., & Bousquet, F. (2010) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.03.007 · Cited by 1,354 · cited 4×
“…assessment models or tools to enhance the effectiveness of decision-making andmanagement has beenwidely acknowledged (see for example Bland, 1999; Voinov and Bousquet 2010; Carnevale et al., 2012; Hong et al., 2012; Jakeman and Letcher, 2003; Gough et al., 1998; Kragt et al., 2011; Liu et al.,…”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationMulti-agent simulations and ecosystem management: a review
Bousquet, F., & Le Page, C. (2004) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.01.011 · Cited by 736
Cited by
Gumbricht, T., Roman‐Cuesta, R. M., Verchot, L., Herold, M., Wittmann, F., Householder, E., Herold, N., & Murdiyarso, D. (2017) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.13689 · Cited by 429
Tools and methods in participatory modeling: Selecting the right tool for the job
Voinov, A., Jenni, K., Gray, S., Kolagani, N., Glynn, P. D., Bommel, P., Prell, C., Zellner, M., Paolisso, M., Jordan, R., et al. (2018) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.08.028 · Cited by 428
Self-citationMethods and approaches to modelling the Anthropocene
Verburg, P. H., Dearing, J. A., Dyke, J. G., Leeuw, S. V. D., Seitzinger, S., Steffen, W., & Syvitski, J. (2016) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.08.007 · Cited by 364
Collaborative modelling or participatory modelling? A framework for water resources management
Basco-Carrera, L., Warren, A., van Beek, E., Jonoski, A., & Giardino, A. (2017) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.01.014 · Cited by 295
Integrated assessment and modelling: Overview and synthesis of salient dimensions
Hamilton, S. H., ElSawah, S., Guillaume, J. H. A., Jakeman, A. J., & Pierce, S. A. (2015) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.12.005 · Cited by 277
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kelly (Letcher), R. A., Jakeman, A. J., Barreteau, O., Borsuk, M. E., ElSawah, S., Hamilton, S. H., Henriksen, H. J., Kuikka, S., Maier, H. R., Rizzoli, A. E., van Delden, H., & Voinov, A. A.
- Venue
- Environmental Modelling & Software
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-09
- Volume
- 47
- Pages
- 159-181
- ISSN
- 1364-8152 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2085593420
- Cited by
- 812
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 83.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Selecting among five common modelling approaches for integrated environmental assessment and management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.05.005
- The paper
- Kelly (Letcher), R. A., Jakeman, A. J., Barreteau, O., Borsuk, M. E., ElSawah, S., Hamilton, S. H., Henriksen, H. J., Kuikka, S., Maier, H. R., Rizzoli, A. E., van Delden, H., & Voinov, A. A. (2013). Selecting among five common modelling approaches for integrated environmental assessment and management. Environmental Modelling & Software. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.05.005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
