Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 186

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An introduction to sensitivity assessment of simulation models

Open access
Norton, John·2015·Environmental Modelling & Software

Abstract

In view of increasing application of sensitivity assessment (SA) to environmental simulation models, a relatively short, informal introduction to aims and methods of SA is given. Their variety, motivation and scope are illustrated by outlines of a broad selection of approaches. Methods based on derivatives, algebraic analysis, sparse sampling, variance decomposition, Fourier analysis and binary classification are included. A concise introductory overview of sensitivity assessment (SA) methods for simulation models is given.A broad selection of methods is introduced informally and with no more mathematics than necessary.The motivation of the methods, their scope and their limitations are discussed.Derivative-based SA, algebraic SA, SA of dynamical models, sampled SA, regional SA and SA by emulation are outlined.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.03.020

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 186

Metadata

Authors
Norton, J.
Venue
Environmental Modelling & Software
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-07
Volume
69
Pages
166-174
ISSN
1364-8152 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2054740476
Cited by
186
References
2
FWCI
15.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An introduction to sensitivity assessment of simulation models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.03.020
The paper
Norton, J. (2015). An introduction to sensitivity assessment of simulation models. Environmental Modelling & Software. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.03.020

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.