Cited by 17Epilepsy research and treatmentMemory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Dual mechanisms of rapid expression of anxiety-related behavior in pilocarpine-treated epileptic mice

Open access
Otsuka, Shintaro, Ohkido, Taro, Itakura, Makoto, Watanabe, Shigeru, Yamamori, Saori, Iida, Yuuki, Saito, Masanori, Miyaoka, Hitoshi +1 more·2016·Epilepsy Research

Abstract

A mouse model of epilepsy was generated by inducing status epilepticus (SE) for either 1.5 or 4.5h with pilocarpine to study anxiety-related behaviors, changes in the electroencephalogram of the cerebral cortex and hippocampus, and expression of hippocampal proteins. The viability and rate of success of SE induction were high in C57BL/6N mice but not in C57BL/6J mice. C57BL/6N mice were immotile during the first 2days after SE; however, by the third day, most mice were recovered and exhibited strong anxiety-related behaviors in response to the light/dark preference test and open field test. There was a striking difference in the temporal appearance of anxiety-related behavior between the two SE durations: 1.5h SE mice exhibited strong anxiety-related behavior 3days after SE that gradually attenuated over the next few weeks, whereas 4.5h SE mice exhibited strong anxiety-related behavior 3days after SE that persisted even at nearly 1year after SE. Mice receiving both SE durations exhibited generalized seizures (GS) after SE; however, there was a marked difference in the timing and duration of GS appearance. Mice in the 4.5h SE group exhibited spontaneous GS from 4days to at least 96days after SE. In contrast, mice in the 1.5h SE group exhibited GS only within the first several days after SE; however, epileptic spike clusters continuously appeared in the cerebral cortex and hippocampus for up to twelve days after SE. Among the hippocampal proteins tested, only brain derived-neurotrophic factor (BDNF) exhibited altered expression in parallel with anxiety-related behavior. These results showed the possibility that BDNF expression in the hippocampus might cause anxiety-related behavior in adulthood.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2016.04.007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 17

Authors
Otsuka, S., Ohkido, T., Itakura, M., Watanabe, S., Yamamori, S., Iida, Y., Saito, M., Miyaoka, H., & Takahashi, M.
Affiliations
Kitasato University (JP)
Corresponding author
Takahashi, Masami
Venue
Epilepsy Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-07
Volume
123
Pages
55-67
ISSN
0920-1211 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2343208079
Cited by
17
References
41
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Epilepsy Research (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Japan Science and Technology Agency
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus, anxiety-like behavior, generalized seizures, hippocampal BDNF, C57BL/6N mice, C57BL/6J mice, seizure duration, open field test
MeSH terms
Behavior Observation Techniques, Actins, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Anxiety, Disease Models, Animal, Electroencephalography, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, Hippocampus, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Pilocarpine, Status Epilepticus, Time Factors, Receptors, Glutamate, Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review