The DOI matches its Crossref record.
New Early to Middle Triassic U–Pb ages from South China: Calibration with ammonoid biochronozones and implications for the timing of the Triassic biotic recovery
Open accessAbstract
New zircon U–Pb ages are proposed for late Early and Middle Triassic volcanic ash layers from the Luolou and Baifeng formations (northwestern Guangxi, South China). These ages are based on analyses of single, thermally annealed and chemically abraded zircons. Calibration with ammonoid ages indicate a 250.6±0.5 Ma age for the early Spathian Tirolites/Columbites beds, a 248.1±0.4 Ma age for the late Spathian Neopopanoceras haugi Zone, a 246.9±0.4 Ma age for the early middle Anisian Acrochordiceras hyatti Zone, and a 244.6±0.5 Ma age for the late middle Anisian Balatonites shoshonensis Zone. The new dates and previously published U–Pb ages indicate a duration of ca. 3 my for the Spathian, and minimal durations of 4.5±0.6 my for the Early Triassic and of 6.6+0.7/−0.9 my for the Anisian. The new Spathian dates are in a better agreement with a 252.6±0.2 Ma age than with a 251.4±0.3 Ma age for the Permian–Triassic boundary. These dates also highlight the extremely uneven duration of the four Early Triassic substages (Griesbachian, Dienerian, Smithian, and Spathian), of which the Spathian exceeds half of the duration of the entire Early Triassic. The simplistic assumption of equal duration of the four Early Triassic subdivisions is no longer tenable for the reconstruction of recovery patterns following the end Permian mass extinction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Marine productivity changes during the end-Permian crisis and Early Triassic recovery
Shen, J., Schoepfer, S. D., Feng, Q., Zhou, L., Yu, J., Song, H., Wei, H., & Algeo, T. J. (2015) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.11.002 · Cited by 329
Marine anoxia and delayed Earth system recovery after the end-Permian extinction
Lau, K. V., Maher, K., Altiner, D., Kelley, B. M., Kump, L. R., Lehrmann, D. J., Silva-Tamayo, J. C., Weaver, K. L., Yu, M., & Payne, J. L. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1515080113 · Cited by 294
The Triassic timescale: new constraints and a review of geochronological data
Mundil, R., Pálfy, J., Renne, P. R., & Brack, P. (2010) · Geological Society, London, Special Publications · doi:10.1144/sp334.3 · Cited by 152
Radiometric ages used in GTS2012
Schmitz, M. D. (2012) · The Geologic Time Scale · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-59425-9.15002-4 · Cited by 99
Metadata
- Authors
- Ovtcharova, M., Bucher, H., Schaltegger, U., Galfetti, T., Brayard, A., & Guex, J.
- Venue
- Earth and Planetary Science Letters
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 243
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 463-475
- ISSN
- 0012-821X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2012576047
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New Early to Middle Triassic U–Pb ages from South China: Calibration with ammonoid biochronozones and implications for the timing of the Triassic biotic recovery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.epsl.2006.01.042
- The paper
- Ovtcharova, M., Bucher, H., Schaltegger, U., Galfetti, T., Brayard, A., & Guex, J. (2006). New Early to Middle Triassic U–Pb ages from South China: Calibration with ammonoid biochronozones and implications for the timing of the Triassic biotic recovery. Earth and Planetary Science Letters. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2006.01.042
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.