Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 800

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantification of Holocene Asian monsoon rainfall from spatially separated cave records

Open access
Hu, Chaoyong, Henderson, Gideon M., Huang, Junhua, Xie, Shucheng, Sun, Ying, Johnson, Kathleen R.·2008·Earth and Planetary Science Letters

Abstract

Abstract A reconstruction of Holocene rainfall is presented for southwest China — an area prone to drought and flooding due to variability in the East Asian monsoon. The reconstruction is derived by comparing a new high-resolution stalagmite δ 18 O record with an existing record from the same moisture transport pathway. The new record is from Heshang Cave (30°27′N, 110°25′E; 294 m) and shows no sign of kinetic or evaporative effects so can be reliably interpreted as a record of local rainfall composition and temperature. Heshang lies 600 km downwind from Dongge Cave which has a published high-resolution δ 18 O record (Wang, Y.J., Cheng, H., Edwards, R.L., He, Y.Q., Kong, X.G., An, Z.S., Wu, J.Y., Kelly, M.J., Dykoski, C.A., Li, X.D., 2005. The Holocene Asian monsoon: links to solar changes and North Atlantic climate. Science 308, 854–857). By differencing co-eval δ 18 O values for the two caves, secondary controls on δ 18 O (e.g. moisture source, moisture transport, non-local rainfall, temperature) are circumvented and the resulting Δ δ 18 O signal is controlled directly by the amount of rain falling between the two sites. This is confirmed by comparison with rainfall data from the instrumental record, which also allows a calibration of the Δ δ 18 O proxy. The calibrated Δ δ 18 O record provides a quantitative history of rainfall in southwest China which demonstrates that rainfall was 8% higher than today during the Holocene climatic optimum (≈ 6 ka), but only 3% higher during the early Holocene. Significant multi-centennial variability also occurred, with notable dry periods at 8.2 ka, 4.8–4.1 ka, 3.7–3.1 ka, 1.4–1.0 ka and during the Little Ice Age. This Holocene rainfall record provides a good target with which to test climate models. The approach used here, of combining stalagmite records from more than one location, will also allow quantification of rainfall patterns for past times in other regions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.epsl.2007.10.015

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Cited by

See all 800

Metadata

Authors
Hu, C., Henderson, G. M., Huang, J., Xie, S., Sun, Y., & Johnson, K. R.
Venue
Earth and Planetary Science Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-02
Volume
266
Issue
3-4
Pages
221-232
ISSN
0012-821X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2041756570
Cited by
800
References
33
FWCI
13.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantification of Holocene Asian monsoon rainfall from spatially separated cave records. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.epsl.2007.10.015
The paper
Hu, C., Henderson, G. M., Huang, J., Xie, S., Sun, Y., & Johnson, K. R. (2008). Quantification of Holocene Asian monsoon rainfall from spatially separated cave records. Earth and Planetary Science Letters. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2007.10.015

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.