The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Continental collision and slab break-off: A comparison of 3-D numerical models with observations
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Conditions and dynamics of subduction–collision and subsequent 3-D slab break-off and slab tear propagation are quantified, for the first time, using fully dynamic numerical models. Model results indicate that collision after the subduction of old, strong subducting oceanic slab leads to slab break-off at 20–25 Myr after the onset of continental collision, and subsequently a slab tear migrates more or less horizontally through the slab with a propagation speed of 100–150 mm/yr. In contrast, young, weak oceanic slabs show the first break-off already 10 Myr after continental collision, and can experience tear migration rates up to 800 mm/yr. Slab strength plays a more important role in the timing of slab break-off and the speed of a propagating slab tear than (negative) slab buoyancy does. Slab break-off is viable even for slabs that are supported by the viscosity jump and phase change between the upper and lower mantle. The density of the oceanic slab and the subducting continental block is important for the amount of continental subduction and the depth of slab break-off. A 40-km thick continental crust can be buried to depths greater than 200 km, although this maximum depth is significantly less for younger or very weak slabs, or thicker continental crust. Slab break-off typically starts at a depth of 300 km, mostly independent of mantle rheology, but, like continental crustal burial, can be shallower for young or buoyant plates. Our 3-D models illustrate how, due to the difference in necking in 2-D and 3-D, break-off has an intrinsic small preference to start as a slab window within the slab's interior, rather than as a slab tear at the slab edge. However, any significant asymmetry in the collision setting, e.g. earlier collision at one end of the subduction zone, would override this, and leads to slab tearing starting near one edge of the slab. These results put important new constraints on the dynamics of the collision and subsequent slab break-off for modern collision belts. For a proposed timing of the initial Arabia–Eurasia collision at 35 Ma, break-off of the ~ 200-Myr-old Neo-Tethys slab is unlikely to have occurred before 15–10 Ma. Furthermore, our results illustrate that shallow, early break-off of weak slabs provides a viable explanation for the absence of blueschists and ultra-high pressure metamorphism in the Precambrian geological record.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Byerlee, J. (1978) · pure and applied geophysics · doi:10.1007/bf00876528 · Cited by 4,029
An analysis of the variation of ocean floor bathymetry and heat flow with age
Parsons, B., & Sclater, J. G. (1977) · Journal of Geophysical Research · doi:10.1029/jb082i005p00803 · Cited by 2,821
Geodynamics applications of continuum physics to geological problems
Turcotte, D. L., & Schubert, G. (1982) · Andalas University Repository (Andalas University) · Cited by 1,921
Rheology of the Upper Mantle: A Synthesis
Karato, S.-I., & Wu, P. (1993) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.260.5109.771 · Cited by 1,784
Subduction and Slab Detachment in the Mediterranean-Carpathian Region
Wortel, M. J. R., & Spakman, W. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5498.1910 · Cited by 1,626
Geodynamics: Applications of Continuum Physics to Geological Problems
England, P. (1983) · Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union · doi:10.1029/eo064i011p00106-01 · Cited by 1,605
Strength of the lithosphere: Constraints imposed by laboratory experiments
Kohlstedt, D. L., Evans, B., & Mackwell, S. J. (1995) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/95jb01460 · Cited by 1,603
Huw Davies, J., & von Blanckenburg, F. (1995) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/0012-821x(94)00237-s · Cited by 1,579
Rheology of the upper mantle and the mantle wedge: A view from the experimentalists
Hirth, G., & Kohlstedt, D. (2003) · Geophysical Monograph Series · doi:10.1029/138gm06 · Cited by 1,561
A model for the global variation in oceanic depth and heat flow with lithospheric age
Stein, C. A., & Stein, S. (1992) · Nature · doi:10.1038/359123a0 · Cited by 1,515
Cited by
Laurent, O., Martin, H., Moyen, J. F., & Doucelance, R. (2014) · Lithos · doi:10.1016/j.lithos.2014.06.012 · Cited by 938
Mouthereau, F., Lacombe, O., & Vergés, J. (2012) · Tectonophysics · doi:10.1016/j.tecto.2012.01.022 · Cited by 657
Cretaceous tectonic evolution of South China: A preliminary synthesis
Li, J., Zhang, Y., Dong, S., & Johnston, S. T. (2014) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.03.008 · Cited by 631
Introduction to Numerical Geodynamic Modelling
Gerya, T. (2009) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511809101 · Cited by 461
Dating the India–Eurasia collision through arc magmatic records
Bouilhol, P., Jagoutz, O., Hanchar, J. M., & Dudas, F. O. (2013) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2013.01.023 · Cited by 448
Metadata
- Authors
- van Hunen, J., & Allen, M. B.
- Venue
- Earth and Planetary Science Letters
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-02
- Volume
- 302
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 27-37
- ISSN
- 0012-821X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2156954089
- Cited by
- 498
- References
- 60
- FWCI
- 18.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Continental collision and slab break-off: A comparison of 3-D numerical models with observations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.epsl.2010.11.035
- The paper
- van Hunen, J., & Allen, M. B. (2011). Continental collision and slab break-off: A comparison of 3-D numerical models with observations. Earth and Planetary Science Letters. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2010.11.035
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.