CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 43Paleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchAstro and Planetary Science

Using raindrops to constrain past atmospheric density

Open access
Kavanagh, Lucas, Goldblatt, Colin·2015·Earth and Planetary Science Letters
DOI 10.1016/j.epsl.2014.12.032
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.epsl.2014.12.032

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 24 · Cited by 43

Authors
Kavanagh, L., & Goldblatt, C.
Affiliations
University of Victoria (CA)
Corresponding author
Kavanagh, Lucas
ORCID
Venue
Earth and Planetary Science Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-03
Volume
413
Pages
51-58
ISSN
0012-821X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.epsl.2014.12.032
OpenAlex
W2013620884
Cited by
43
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2
FWCI
5.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Earth and Planetary Science Letters (publishedVersion)
  • UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • University of Victoria
  • NSERC
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
Keywords
air density, Archean atmosphere, early Earth atmosphere, droplet size, rainfall intensity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review