CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 103Energy and Environment ImpactsEnergy, Environment, and Transportation PoliciesPro-Environmental Behavior and Attitudes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A systematic review of household energy transition in low and middle income countries

Guta, Dawit, Baumgartner, Jill, Jack, Darby, Carter, Ellison, Shen, Guofeng, Orgill-Meyer, Jennifer, Rosenthal, Joshua, Dickinson, Katherine, Bailis, Rob, Masuda, Yuta, Zerriffi, Hisham·2022·Energy Research & Social Science
DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102463
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102463

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 123

  1. Parikh, 2011, Hardships and health impacts on women due to traditional cooking fuels: a case study of Himachal Pradesh, India, Energy Policy, 39, 7587, 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.05.055 · DOI
  2. Smith, 2011, Effect of reduction in household air pollution on childhood pneumonia in Guatemala (RESPIRE): a randomised controlled trial, Lancet, 378, 1717, 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60921-5 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Sulaiman, 2017, Wood fuel consumption and mortality rates in Sub-Saharan Africa: evidence from a dynamic panel study, Chemosphere, 177, 224, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.03.019 · DOI
  4. Anenberg, 2012, Clean stoves benefit climate and health, Nature, 490, 343, 10.1038/490343e · DOI
  5. Rosenthal, 2018, Clean cooking and the SDGs: integrated analytical approaches to guide energy interventions for health and environment goals, Energy Sustain. Dev., 42, 152, 10.1016/j.esd.2017.11.003 · DOI
  6. Kowsari, 2011, Three dimensional energy profile: a conceptual framework for assessing household energy use, Energy Policy, 39, 7505, 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.06.030 · DOI
  7. Ruiz-Mercado, 2015, Patterns of stove use in the context of fuel-device stacking: rationale and implications, Ecohealth, 12, 42, 10.1007/s10393-015-1009-4 · DOI
  8. Masera, 2000, From linear fuel switching to multiple cooking strategies: a critique and alternative to the energy ladder model, World Dev., 28, 2083, 10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00076-0 · DOI
  9. Clark, 2017, Adoption and use of a semi-gasifier cooking and water heating stove and fuel intervention in the Tibetan Plateau, China, Environ. Res. Lett., 12, 10.1088/1748-9326/aa751e · DOI
  10. Hiemstra-Van der Horst, 2008, Reassessing the ‘energy ladder’: household energy use in Maun, Botswana, Energy Policy, 36, 3333, 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.05.006 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Gould, 2018, LPG as a clean cooking fuel: adoption, use, and impact in rural India, Energy Policy, 122, 395, 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.07.042 · DOI
  12. Jeuland, 2012, Benefits and costs of improved cookstoves: assessing the implications of variability in health, forest and climate impacts, PLoS One, 7, 10.1371/journal.pone.0030338 · DOI
  13. Quinn, 2018, An analysis of efforts to scale up clean household energy for cooking around the world, Energy Sustain. Dev., 46, 1, 10.1016/j.esd.2018.06.011 · DOI
  14. Dickinson, 2019, Adoption of improved biomass stoves and stove/fuel stacking in the REACCTING intervention study in northern Ghana, Energy Policy, 130, 361, 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.12.007 · DOI
  15. Kar, 2018, From cookstove acquisition to cooking transition: framing the behavioural aspects of cookstove interventions, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 42, 23, 10.1016/j.erss.2018.02.015 · DOI
  16. Shankar, 2020, Everybody stacks: lessons from household energy case studies to inform design principles for clean energy transitions, Energy Policy, 141, 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111468 · DOI
  17. Agarwal, 1983, Diffusion of rural innovations: some analytical issues and the case of wood-burning stoves, World Dev., 11, 359, 10.1016/0305-750X(83)90047-5 · DOI
  18. Lewis, 2012, Who adopts improved fuels and cookstoves? A systematic review, Environ. Health Perspect., 120, 637, 10.1289/ehp.1104194 · DOI
  19. Debbi, 2014, Factors influencing household uptake of improved solid fuel stoves in low-and middle-income countries: a qualitative systematic review, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 11, 8228, 10.3390/ijerph110808228 · DOI
  20. Shen, 2015, Factors influencing the adoption and sustainable use of clean fuels and cookstoves in China-a Chinese literature review, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 51, 741, 10.1016/j.rser.2015.06.049 · DOI
  21. Puzzolo, 2016, Clean fuels for resource-poor settings: a systematic review of barriers and enablers to adoption and sustained use, Environ. Res., 146, 218, 10.1016/j.envres.2016.01.002 · DOI
  22. Vigolo, 2018, Drivers and barriers to clean cooking: a systematic literature review from a consumer behavior perspective, Sustainability, 10, 4322, 10.3390/su10114322 · DOI
  23. Lindgren, 2020, Clean cooking for all? A critical review of behavior, stakeholder engagement, and adoption for the global diffusion of improved cookstoves, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 68, 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101539 · DOI
  24. Johnson, 2015, Quantitative guidance for stove usage and performance to achieve health and environmental targets, Environ. Health Perspect., 123, 820, 10.1289/ehp.1408681 · DOI
  25. Bonan, 2017, Access to modern energy: a review of barriers, drivers and impacts, Environ. Dev. Econ., 22, 491, 10.1017/S1355770X17000201 · DOI
  26. Carter, 2020, Household transitions to clean energy in a multiprovincial cohort study in China, Nat. Sustain., 3, 42, 10.1038/s41893-019-0432-x · DOI
  27. Pickering, 2014, The benefits of publishing systematic quantitative literature reviews for PhD candidates and other early-career researchers, High. Educ. Res. Dev., 33, 534, 10.1080/07294360.2013.841651 · DOI
  28. Byrne, 2014, Climate change, energy policy and justice: a systematic review, Anal. Krit., 36, 315, 10.1515/auk-2014-0207 · DOI
  29. Behera, 2015, Household collection and use of biomass energy sources in South Asia, Energy, 85, 468, 10.1016/j.energy.2015.03.059 · DOI
  30. Rehfuess, 2010, Bayesian modelling of household solid fuel use: insights towards designing effective interventions to promote fuel switching in Africa, Environ. Res., 110, 725, 10.1016/j.envres.2010.07.006 · DOI
  31. Feyisa, 2019, Determinants of household adoption of electric Injera Mitad in urban Ethiopia: a case study of Woliso town, Am. J. Econ., 9, 216
  32. Pattanayak, 2019, Experimental evidence on promotion of electric and improved biomass cookstoves, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 116, 13282, 10.1073/pnas.1808827116 · DOI
  33. Arthur, 2010, On the adoption of electricity as a domestic source by Mozambican households, Energy Policy, 38, 7235, 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.07.054 · DOI
  34. Karimu, 2016, Who adopts LPG as the main cooking fuel and why? Empirical evidence on Ghana based on national survey, World Dev., 85, 43, 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.05.004 · DOI
  35. Malakar, 2018, Studying household decision-making context and cooking fuel transition in rural India, Energy Sustain. Dev., 43, 68, 10.1016/j.esd.2017.12.006 · DOI
  36. Kar, 2019, Using sales data to assess cooking gas adoption and the impact of India’s Ujjwala programme in rural Karnataka, Nat. Energy, 4, 806, 10.1038/s41560-019-0429-8 · DOI
  37. Ronzi, 2019, Using photovoice methods as a community-based participatory research tool to advance uptake of clean cooking and improve health: the LPG adoption in Cameroon evaluation studies, Soc. Sci. Med., 228, 30, 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.02.044 · DOI
  38. Troncoso, 2019, Adoption of LPG for cooking in two rural communities of Chiapas, Mexico, Energy Policy, 133, 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.110925 · DOI
  39. Astuti, 2019, A successful fuel transition? Regulatory instruments, markets, and social acceptance in the adoption of modern LPG cooking devices in Indonesia, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 58, 10.1016/j.erss.2019.101248 · DOI
  40. Stanistreet, 2019, Barriers and facilitators to the adoption and sustained use of cleaner fuels in Southwest Cameroon: situating ‘Lay’Knowledge within evidence-based policy and practice, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 16, 4702, 10.3390/ijerph16234702 · DOI
  41. Kumar, 2017, Adoption and sustained use of cleaner cooking fuels in rural India: a case control study protocol to understand household, network, and organizational drivers, Arch. Public Health, 75, 70, 10.1186/s13690-017-0244-2 · DOI
  42. Mengistu, 2016, Factors affecting households’ decisions in biogas technology adoption, the case of Ofla and Mecha Districts, northern Ethiopia, Renew. Energy, 93, 215, 10.1016/j.renene.2016.02.066 · DOI
  43. Uhunamure, 2019, Correlating the factors influencing household decisions on adoption and utilisation of biogas technology in South Africa, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 107, 264, 10.1016/j.rser.2019.03.006 · DOI
  44. Kelebe, 2017, Determinants for adoption decision of small scale biogas technology by rural households in Tigray, Ethiopia, Energy Econ., 66, 272, 10.1016/j.eneco.2017.06.022 · DOI
  45. Yasmin, 2019, Adoption and diffusion of renewable energy – the case of biogas as alternative fuel for cooking in Pakistan, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 101, 255, 10.1016/j.rser.2018.10.011 · DOI
  46. Kabir, 2013, Factors determinant of biogas adoption in Bangladesh, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 28, 881, 10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.046 · DOI
  47. Sun, 2014, Impact of government subsidies on household biogas use in rural China, Energy Policy, 73, 748, 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.06.009 · DOI
  48. Elmustapha, 2018, Consumer renewable energy technology adoption decision-making; comparing models on perceived attributes and attitudinal constructs in the case of solar water heaters in Lebanon, J. Clean. Prod., 172, 347, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.131 · DOI
  49. Vanschoenwinkel, 2014, Solar cooking in Senegalese villages: an application of best–worst scaling, Energy Policy, 67, 447, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.12.038 · DOI
  50. Mudombi, 2018, User perceptions about the adoption and use of ethanol fuel and cookstoves in Maputo, Mozambique, Energy Sustain. Dev., 44, 97, 10.1016/j.esd.2018.03.004 · DOI
  51. Silk, 2012, A strategy to increase adoption of locally-produced, ceramic cookstoves in rural Kenyan households, BMC Public Health, 12, 359, 10.1186/1471-2458-12-359 · DOI
  52. Thurber, 2014, ‘Oorja’ in India: assessing a large-scale commercial distribution of advanced biomass stoves to households, Energy Sustain. Dev., 19, 138, 10.1016/j.esd.2014.01.002 · DOI
  53. Mobarak, 2012, Low demand for nontraditional cookstove technologies, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 109, 10815, 10.1073/pnas.1115571109 · DOI · Paper page
  54. Jagger, 2019, Early adoption of an improved household energy system in urban Rwanda, Ecohealth, 16, 7, 10.1007/s10393-018-1391-9 · DOI
  55. Usmani, 2017, Can economic incentives enhance adoption and use of a household energy technology ? Evidence from a pilot study in Cambodia, Environ. Res. Lett., 12, 035009, 10.1088/1748-9326/aa6008 · DOI
  56. Gitau, 2019, Factors influencing the adoption of biochar-producing gasifier cookstoves by households in rural Kenya, Energy Sustain. Dev., 52, 63, 10.1016/j.esd.2019.07.006 · DOI
  57. Beyene, 2013, Clean fuel-saving technology adoption in urban Ethiopia, Energy Econ., 36, 605, 10.1016/j.eneco.2012.11.003 · DOI
  58. Seguin, 2018, Barriers and facilitators to adoption and use of fuel pellets and improved cookstoves in urban Rwanda, PLoS One, 13, 10.1371/journal.pone.0203775 · DOI
  59. Jewitt, 2020, ‘We cannot stop cooking’: stove stacking, seasonality and the risky practices of household cookstove transitions in Nigeria, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 61, 10.1016/j.erss.2019.101340 · DOI
  60. Agbokey, 2019, Determining the enablers and barriers for the adoption of clean Cookstoves in the Middle Belt of GhanaA qualitative study, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 16, 1207, 10.3390/ijerph16071207 · DOI
  61. Bielecki, 2014, Rethinking improved cookstove diffusion programs: a case study of social perceptions and cooking choices in rural Guatemala, Energy Policy, 66, 350, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.082 · DOI
  62. Hollada, 2017, Perceptions of improved biomass and liquefied petroleum gas stoves in Puno, Peru: implications for promoting sustained and exclusive adoption of clean cooking technologies, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 14, 182, 10.3390/ijerph14020182 · DOI
  63. Namagembe, 2015, Factors influencing the acquisition and correct and consistent use of the top-lit updraft cookstove in Uganda, J. Health Commun., 20, 76, 10.1080/10810730.2014.994245 · DOI
  64. Martin, 2013, Using formative research to design a behavior change strategy to increase the use of improved cookstoves in peri-urban Kampala, Uganda, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 10, 6920, 10.3390/ijerph10126920 · DOI
  65. Alem, 2014, Adoption and disadoption of electric cookstoves in urban Ethiopia: evidence from panel data, Resour. Energy Econ., 38, 110, 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2014.06.004 · DOI
  66. Wolf, 2017, Adoption of clean cookstoves after improved solid fuel stove programme exposure: a cross-sectional study in three Peruvian Andean regions, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 14, 745, 10.3390/ijerph14070745 · DOI
  67. Chalise, 2018, Dynamics of sustained use and abandonment of clean cooking systems: lessons from rural India, Environ. Res. Lett., 13, 10.1088/1748-9326/aab0af · DOI
  68. Lwiza, 2017, Dis-adoption of household biogas technologies in Central Uganda, Energy Sustain. Dev., 37, 124, 10.1016/j.esd.2017.01.006 · DOI
  69. Sabyrbekov, 2019, Transitions from dirty to clean energy in low-income countries: insights from Kyrgyzstan, Cent. Asian Surv., 38, 255, 10.1080/02634937.2019.1605976 · DOI
  70. Karimu, 2015, Cooking fuel preferences among Ghanaian households: an empirical analysis, Energy Sustain. Dev., 27, 10, 10.1016/j.esd.2015.04.003 · DOI
  71. Dendup, 2019, Information leverage: the adoption of clean cooking fuel in Bhutan, Energy Policy, 125, 181, 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.10.054 · DOI
  72. Ozoh, 2018, Cooking fuels in Lagos, Nigeria: factors associated with household choice of kerosene or liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 15, 641, 10.3390/ijerph15040641 · DOI
  73. Paudel, 2018, Understanding the determinants of household cooking fuel choice in Afghanistan: a multinomial logit estimation, Energy, 156, 55, 10.1016/j.energy.2018.05.085 · DOI
  74. Choumert-Nkolo, 2019, Stacking up the ladder: a panel data analysis of Tanzanian household energy choices, World Dev., 115, 222, 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.11.016 · DOI
  75. van der Kroon, 2014, The impact of the household decision environment on fuel choice behavior, Energy Econ., 44, 236, 10.1016/j.eneco.2014.04.008 · DOI
  76. Takama, 2012, Evaluating the relative strength of product-specific factors in fuel switching and stove choice decisions in Ethiopia. A discrete choice model of household preferences for clean cooking alternatives, Energy Econ., 34, 1763, 10.1016/j.eneco.2012.07.001 · DOI
  77. Rahut, 2019, Wealth, education and cooking-fuel choices among rural households in Pakistan, Energy Strategy Rev., 24, 236, 10.1016/j.esr.2019.03.005 · DOI
  78. Bahadur Rahut, 2016, Household energy choice and consumption intensity: empirical evidence from Bhutan, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 53, 993, 10.1016/j.rser.2015.09.019 · DOI
  79. Menghwani, 2019, Determinants of Cookstoves and fuel choice among rural households in India, Ecohealth, 16, 21, 10.1007/s10393-018-1389-3 · DOI
  80. Bensch, 2015, Why do households forego high returns from technology adoption? Evidence from improved cooking stoves in Burkina Faso, J. Econ. Behav. Organ., 116, 187, 10.1016/j.jebo.2015.04.023 · DOI
  81. Zhu, 2014, Cleaning the energy sources for water heating among Nanjing households: barriers and opportunities for solar and natural gas, Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 8, 757, 10.1007/s11783-013-0603-3 · DOI
  82. Ahmad, 2015, Fuel switching in slum and non-slum households in urban India, J. Clean. Prod., 94, 130, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.072 · DOI
  83. Joshi, 2017, Household preferences for cooking fuels and inter-fuel substitutions: unlocking the modern fuels in the Nepalese household, Energy Policy, 107, 507, 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.05.031 · DOI
  84. Guta, 2012, Application of an almost ideal demand system (AIDS) to Ethiopian rural residential energy use: panel data evidence, Energy Policy, 50, 528, 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.07.055 · DOI
  85. Alem, 2016, Modeling household cooking fuel choice: a panel multinomial logit approach, Energy Econ., 59, 129, 10.1016/j.eneco.2016.06.025 · DOI
  86. Olabisi, 2019, Energy demand substitution from biomass to imported kerosene: evidence from Tanzania, Energy Policy, 130, 243, 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.03.060 · DOI
  87. Ajayi, 2018, Urban household energy demand in Southwest Nigeria, Afr. Dev. Rev., 30, 410, 10.1111/1467-8268.12348 · DOI
  88. Irfan, 2018, Household energy elasticities and policy implications for Pakistan, Energy Policy, 113, 633, 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.11.041 · DOI
  89. Zou, 2019, Rural household energy consumption characteristics and determinants in China, Energy, 182, 814, 10.1016/j.energy.2019.06.048 · DOI
  90. Ma, 2018, Income elasticity of cooking fuel substitution in rural China: evidence from population census data, J. Clean. Prod., 199, 1083, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.215 · DOI
  91. D’Agostino, 2015, Socio-economic determinants of charcoal expenditures in Tanzania: evidence from panel data, Energy Econ., 49, 472, 10.1016/j.eneco.2015.03.007 · DOI
  92. Lee, 2013, Household energy mix in Uganda, Energy Econ., 39, 252, 10.1016/j.eneco.2013.05.010 · DOI
  93. Pope, 2018, Household determinants of liquified petroleum gas (LPG) as a cooking fuel in SW Cameroon, EcoHealth, 15, 729, 10.1007/s10393-018-1367-9 · DOI
  94. Sharma, 2019, Transition to LPG for cooking: a case study from two states of India, Energy Sustain. Dev., 51, 63, 10.1016/j.esd.2019.06.001 · DOI
  95. Saxena, 2018, Inequalities in LPG and electricity consumption in India: the role of caste, tribe, and religion, Energy Sustain. Dev., 42, 44, 10.1016/j.esd.2017.09.009 · DOI
  96. Swain, 2020, Determinants of adoption of cleaner cooking energy: experience of the Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana in rural Odisha, India, J. Clean. Prod., 248, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119223 · DOI
  97. Mulenga, 2019, Electricity access and charcoal consumption among urban households in Zambia, Dev. South. Afr., 36, 585, 10.1080/0376835X.2018.1517036 · DOI
  98. Teng, 2019, The demand for coal among China’s rural households: estimates of price and income elasticities, Energy Econ., 80, 928, 10.1016/j.eneco.2019.03.005 · DOI
  99. Jingchao, 2012, The determinants of household energy demand in rural Beijing: can environmentally friendly technologies be effective?, Energy Econ., 34, 381, 10.1016/j.eneco.2011.12.011 · DOI
  100. Guta, 2014, Effect of fuelwood scarcity and socio-economic factors on household bio-based energy use and energy substitution in rural Ethiopia, Energy Policy, 75, 217, 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.09.017 · DOI
  101. Tigabu, 2017, Factors associated with sustained use of improved solid fuel cookstoves: a case study from Kenya, Energy Sustain. Dev., 41, 81, 10.1016/j.esd.2017.08.008 · DOI
  102. McLean, 2019, Household dependence on solid cooking fuels in Peru: an analysis of environmental and socioeconomic conditions, Glob. Environ. Change, 58, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101961 · DOI
  103. Amoah, 2019, Determinants of household’s choice of cooking energy in a global south city, Energy Build., 196, 103, 10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.05.026 · DOI
  104. Pandey, 2011, Comprehending household cooking energy choice in rural India, Biomass Bioenergy, 35, 4724, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.09.020 · DOI
  105. Kimemia, 2016, Domestic LPG interventions in South Africa: challenges and lessons, Energy Policy, 93, 150, 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.005 · DOI
  106. Karakara, 2019, An econometric analysis of domestic fuel consumption in Ghana: implications for poverty reduction, Cogent Soc. Sci., 5, 1697499
  107. Sankhyayan, 2019, ‘Availability’ and/or ‘Affordability’:What matters in household energy access in India?, Energy Policy, 131, 131, 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.04.019 · DOI
  108. Berhe, 2017, Factors influencing the adoption of biogas digesters in rural Ethiopia, Energy Sustain. Soc., 7, 10, 10.1186/s13705-017-0112-5 · DOI
  109. Chen, 2016, Transition of household cookfuels in China from 2010 to 2012, Appl. Energy, 184, 800, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.07.136 · DOI
  110. Mottaleb, 2017, An exploration into the household energy choice and expenditure in Bangladesh, Energy, 135, 767, 10.1016/j.energy.2017.06.117 · DOI
  111. Démurger, 2011, Poverty and firewood consumption: a case study of rural households in northern China, China Econ. Rev., 22, 512, 10.1016/j.chieco.2010.09.009 · DOI
  112. Malakar, 2018, Resistance in rejecting solid fuels: beyond availability and adoption in the structural dominations of cooking practices in rural India, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 46, 225, 10.1016/j.erss.2018.07.025 · DOI
  113. Shallo, 2019, Determinants of functional status of family size bio-digesters: empirical evidence from southern Ethiopia, Int. J. Sustain. Energy, 38, 493, 10.1080/14786451.2018.1538145 · DOI
  114. Baquie, 2017, Access to modern fuels and satisfaction with cooking arrangements: survey evidence from rural India, Energy Sustain. Dev., 38, 34, 10.1016/j.esd.2017.02.003 · DOI
  115. Gould, 2020, Household fuel mixes in peri-urban and rural Ecuador: explaining the context of LPG, patterns of continued firewood use, and the challenges of induction cooking, Energy Policy, 136, 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111053 · DOI
  116. Adusah-Poku, 2019, Household energy expenditure in Ghana: a double-hurdle model approach, World Dev., 117, 266, 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.01.018 · DOI
  117. Yu, 2020, Cooking fuels and risk of all-cause and cardiopulmonary mortality in urban China: a prospective cohort study, Lancet Glob. Health, 8, e430, 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30525-X · DOI
  118. Chen, 2020, Moving towards clean cooking in China, Lancet Glob. Health, 8, e321, 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30542-X · DOI
  119. Coelho, 2018, The energy transition history of fuelwood replacement for liquefied petroleum gas in Brazilian households from 1920 to 2016, Energy Policy, 123, 41, 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.08.041 · DOI
  120. Schueftan, 2013, Reduction of firewood consumption by households in south-central Chile associated with energy efficiency programs, Energy Policy, 63, 823, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.097 · DOI
  121. Piedrahita, 2016, Assessment of cookstove stacking in northern Ghana using surveys and stove use monitors, Energy Sustain. Dev., 34, 67, 10.1016/j.esd.2016.07.007 · DOI
  122. Nerini, 2018, Mapping synergies and trade-offs between energy and the sustainable development goals, Nat. Energy, 3, 10, 10.1038/s41560-017-0036-5 · DOI
  123. Rahut, 2014, Determinants of household energy use in Bhutan, Energy, 69, 661, 10.1016/j.energy.2014.03.062 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Guta, D., Baumgartner, J., Jack, D., Carter, E., Shen, G., Orgill-Meyer, J., Rosenthal, J., Dickinson, K., Bailis, R., Masuda, Y., & Zerriffi, H.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • McGill University (CA)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Colorado State University (US)
  • Peking University (CN)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Colorado School of Public Health (US)
  • Stockholm Environment Institute (GB)
  • The Nature Conservancy (US)
Corresponding author
Guta, Dawit
ORCID
Venue
Energy Research & Social Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-04
Volume
86
Pages
102463
ISSN
2214-6296 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.erss.2021.102463
OpenAlex
W4200424249
Cited by
103
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 5
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Energy Research & Social Science (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • NIH Common Fund
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Energy and Environment Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Pro-Environmental Behavior and Attitudes
Keywords
household energy transition, clean cooking fuels, stove adoption, household decision-making, cooking fuel choice, low- and middle-income countries, household energy costs, conceptual framework

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review