Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 560

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Overview of Large-Scale Underground Energy Storage Technologies for Integration of Renewable Energies and Criteria for Reservoir Identification

Matos, Catarina R., Carneiro, Júlio F., Silva, Patrícia P.·2019·Journal of Energy Storage

Abstract

Abstract The increasing integration of renewable energies in the electricity grid is expected to contribute considerably towards the European Union goals of energy and GHG emissions reduction. However, it also brings new challenges for the grid. Large-scale energy storage can provide means for a better integration of renewable energy sources, balancing supply and demand, increasing energy security, enhancing a better management of the grid and also allowing convergence towards a low carbon economy. One way to ensure large-scale energy storage is to use the storage capacity in underground reservoirs, since geological formations have the potential to store large volumes of fluids with minimal impact to environment and society. There are several technologies which can be viable options for underground energy storage, as well as several types of underground reservoirs can be considered. The underground energy storage technologies for renewable energy integration addressed in this article are: Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES); Underground Pumped Hydro Storage (UPHS); Underground Thermal Energy Storage (UTES); Underground Gas Storage (UGS) and Underground Hydrogen Storage (UHS), both connected to Power-to-gas (P2G) systems. For these different types of underground energy storage technologies there are several suitable geological reservoirs, namely: depleted hydrocarbon reservoirs, porous aquifers, salt formations, engineered rock caverns in host rocks and abandoned mines. Specific site screening criteria are applicable to each of these reservoir types and technologies, determining the viability of the reservoir itself, and of the technology for that site. This paper presents a review of the criteria applied to identify suitable technology-reservoir couples.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.est.2018.11.023

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Cited by

See all 560

Metadata

Authors
Matos, C. R., Carneiro, J. F., & Silva, P. P.
Venue
Journal of Energy Storage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-02
Volume
21
Pages
241-258
ISSN
2352-152X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2902561364
Cited by
560
References
28
FWCI
9.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Overview of Large-Scale Underground Energy Storage Technologies for Integration of Renewable Energies and Criteria for Reservoir Identification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.est.2018.11.023
The paper
Matos, C. R., Carneiro, J. F., & Silva, P. P. (2019). Overview of Large-Scale Underground Energy Storage Technologies for Integration of Renewable Energies and Criteria for Reservoir Identification. Journal of Energy Storage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2018.11.023

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.