The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Overview of Large-Scale Underground Energy Storage Technologies for Integration of Renewable Energies and Criteria for Reservoir Identification
Abstract
Abstract The increasing integration of renewable energies in the electricity grid is expected to contribute considerably towards the European Union goals of energy and GHG emissions reduction. However, it also brings new challenges for the grid. Large-scale energy storage can provide means for a better integration of renewable energy sources, balancing supply and demand, increasing energy security, enhancing a better management of the grid and also allowing convergence towards a low carbon economy. One way to ensure large-scale energy storage is to use the storage capacity in underground reservoirs, since geological formations have the potential to store large volumes of fluids with minimal impact to environment and society. There are several technologies which can be viable options for underground energy storage, as well as several types of underground reservoirs can be considered. The underground energy storage technologies for renewable energy integration addressed in this article are: Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES); Underground Pumped Hydro Storage (UPHS); Underground Thermal Energy Storage (UTES); Underground Gas Storage (UGS) and Underground Hydrogen Storage (UHS), both connected to Power-to-gas (P2G) systems. For these different types of underground energy storage technologies there are several suitable geological reservoirs, namely: depleted hydrocarbon reservoirs, porous aquifers, salt formations, engineered rock caverns in host rocks and abandoned mines. Specific site screening criteria are applicable to each of these reservoir types and technologies, determining the viability of the reservoir itself, and of the technology for that site. This paper presents a review of the criteria applied to identify suitable technology-reservoir couples.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Renewable Power-to-Gas: A technological and economic review
Götz, M., Lefebvre, J., Mörs, F., McDaniel Koch, A., Graf, F., Bajohr, S., Reimert, R., & Kolb, T. (2016) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2015.07.066 · Cited by 2,573
Energy storage technologies and real life applications – A state of the art review
Aneke, M., & Wang, M. (2016) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.06.097 · Cited by 1,754
A review on compressed air energy storage: Basic principles, past milestones and recent developments
Budt, M., Wolf, D., Span, R., & Yan, J. (2016) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.02.108 · Cited by 1,185
Large-scale hydrogen energy storage in salt caverns
Ozarslan, A. (2012) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.07.111 · Cited by 629
State of the art of thermal storage for demand-side management
Arteconi, A., Hewitt, N. J., & Polonara, F. (2012) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.12.045 · Cited by 512
Power-to-Methane: A state-of-the-art review
Ghaib, K., & Ben-Fares, F.-Z. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.08.004 · Cited by 491
Fuel cell electric vehicles and hydrogen infrastructure: status 2012
Eberle, U., Müller, B., & von Helmolt, R. (2012) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c2ee22596d · Cited by 382
A review on compressed air energy storage – A pathway for smart grid and polygeneration
Venkataramani, G., Parankusam, P., Ramalingam, V., & Wang, J. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.002 · Cited by 338
Jensen, S. H., Graves, C., Mogensen, M., Wendel, C., Braun, R., Hughes, G., Gao, Z., & Barnett, S. A. (2015) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c5ee01485a · Cited by 287
Key World Energy Statistics 2018
International Energy Agency (2018) · Key World Energy Statistics · doi:10.1787/key_energ_stat-2018-en · Cited by 262
Cited by
Energy storage systems: a review
Mitali, J., Dhinakaran, S., & Mohamad, A. A. (2022) · Energy Storage and Saving · doi:10.1016/j.enss.2022.07.002 · Cited by 911
(2021) · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.111311 · Cited by 850
Zhang, L., Jia, C., Bai, F., Wang, W., An, S., Zhao, K., Li, Z., Li, J., & Sun, H. (2024) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2023.129455 · Cited by 659
Large-vscale hydrogen production and storage technologies: Current status and future directions
Olabi, A. G., bahri, A. S., Abdelghafar, A. A., Baroutaji, A., Sayed, E. T., Alami, A. H., Rezk, H., & Abdelkareem, M. A. (2021) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.110 · Cited by 492
Hydrogen storage in depleted gas reservoirs: A comprehensive review
Muhammed, N. S., Haq, M. B., Al Shehri, D. A., Al-Ahmed, A., Rahman, M. M., Zaman, E., & Iglauer, S. (2023) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2022.127032 · Cited by 341
Metadata
- Authors
- Matos, C. R., Carneiro, J. F., & Silva, P. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Energy Storage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-02
- Volume
- 21
- Pages
- 241-258
- ISSN
- 2352-152X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2902561364
- Cited by
- 560
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 9.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Overview of Large-Scale Underground Energy Storage Technologies for Integration of Renewable Energies and Criteria for Reservoir Identification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.est.2018.11.023
- The paper
- Matos, C. R., Carneiro, J. F., & Silva, P. P. (2019). Overview of Large-Scale Underground Energy Storage Technologies for Integration of Renewable Energies and Criteria for Reservoir Identification. Journal of Energy Storage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2018.11.023
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.