The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recurrent neural networks employing Lyapunov exponents for EEG signals classification
Abstract
There are a number of different quantitative models that can be used in a medical diagnostic decision support system including parametric methods, non-parametric methods and several neural network models. Unfortunately, there is no theory available to guide model selection. The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the recurrent neural networks (RNNs) employing Lyapunov exponents trained with Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm on the electroencephalogram (EEG) signals. An approach based on the consideration that the EEG signals are chaotic signals was used in developing a reliable classification method for electroencephalographic changes. This consideration was tested successfully using the non-linear dynamics tools, like the computation of Lyapunov exponents. We explored the ability of designed and trained Elman RNNs, combined with the Lyapunov exponents, to discriminate the EEG signals (EEG signals recorded from healthy volunteers with eyes open, epilepsy patients in the epileptogenic zone during a seizure-free interval, and epilepsy patients during epileptic seizures). The RNNs achieved accuracy rates which were higher than that of the feedforward neural network models. The obtained results demonstrated that the proposed RNNs employing the Lyapunov exponents can be useful in analyzing long-term EEG signals for early detection of the electroencephalographic changes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Generalization of back-propagation to recurrent neural networks
Pineda, F. J. (1987) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.59.2229 · Cited by 931
Recurrent neural network-based approach for early recognition of Alzheimer's disease in EEG
Petrosian, A. A., Prokhorov, D. V., Lajara-Nanson, W., & Schiffer, R. B. (2001) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/s1388-2457(01)00579-x · Cited by 126
Cited by
Deep Learning for EEG motor imagery classification based on multi-layer CNNs feature fusion
Amin, S. U., Alsulaiman, M., Muhammad, G., Mekhtiche, M. A., & Shamim Hossain, M. (2019) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2019.06.027 · Cited by 523
Ghosh-Dastidar, S., Adeli, H., & Dadmehr, N. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2007.905490 · Cited by 466
Learning representations for the early detection of sepsis with deep neural networks
Kam, H. J., & Kim, H. Y. (2017) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.08.015 · Cited by 218
Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Automated Diagnosis of Neurological Disorders
Raghavendra, U., Acharya, U. R., & Adeli, H. (2019) · European Neurology · doi:10.1159/000504292 · Cited by 174
Epilepsy Classification for Mining Deeper Relationships between EEG Channels based on GCN
Chen, X., Zheng, Y., Niu, Y., & Li, C. (2020) · 2020 International Conference on Computer Vision, Image and Deep Learning (CVIDL) · doi:10.1109/cvidl51233.2020.00050 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- GULER, N., UBEYLI, E., & GULER, I.
- Venue
- Expert Systems with Applications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-10
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 506-514
- ISSN
- 0957-4174 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2158076175
- Cited by
- 503
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recurrent neural networks employing Lyapunov exponents for EEG signals classification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eswa.2005.04.011
- The paper
- GULER, N., UBEYLI, E., & GULER, I. (2005). Recurrent neural networks employing Lyapunov exponents for EEG signals classification. Expert Systems with Applications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2005.04.011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.