EEG signal classification using wavelet feature extraction and a mixture of expert model.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Feature matrix input can be extracted by wavelet, entropy, STFT, power spectral density, and so on.
“Another form of input is the feature matrix that could be extracted by wavelet, entropy, STFT, power spectral density, and so on (Subasi, 2007; Filippo et al., 2009; Seitsonen et al., 2010; Lu et al., 2017; Lashgari et al., 2020).”
From Data Augmentation for Deep Neural Networks Model in EEG Classification Task: A Review (2021) · cites this paper as Subasi, 2007
Cites
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the <i>EM</i> Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Emotion recognition using multi-modal data and machine learning techniques: A tutorial and review
Zhang, J., Yin, Z., Chen, P., & Nichele, S. (2020) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2020.01.011 · Cited by 806 · see citing works
Combining EEG signal processing with supervised methods for Alzheimer’s patients classification
Fiscon, G., Weitschek, E., Cialini, A., Felici, G., Bertolazzi, P., De Salvo, S., Bramanti, A., Bramanti, P., & De Cola, M. C. (2018) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-018-0613-y · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Automated Diagnosis of Neurological Disorders
Raghavendra, U., Acharya, U. R., & Adeli, H. (2019) · European Neurology · doi:10.1159/000504292 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
A State-of-the-Art Review of EEG-Based Imagined Speech Decoding
Lopez-Bernal, D., Balderas, D., Ponce, P., & Molina, A. (2022) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2022.867281 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Data Augmentation for Deep Neural Networks Model in EEG Classification Task: A Review
He, C., Liu, J., Zhu, Y., & Du, W. (2021) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2021.765525 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
“Another form of input is the feature matrix that could be extracted by wavelet, entropy, STFT, power spectral density, and so on (Subasi, 2007; Filippo et al., 2009; Seitsonen et al., 2010; Lu et al., 2017; Lashgari et al., 2020).”
Background
- Authors
- SUBASI, A.
- Venue
- Expert Systems with Applications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-05
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1084-1093
- ISSN
- 0957-4174 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2081895431
- Cited by
- 1,182
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 50 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 101 · 2019: 90 · 2018: 81 · 2017: 98 · 2016: 79 · 2015: 67 · 2014: 68 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 53
- FWCI
- 7.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Expert Systems with Applications (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
- Keywords
- EEG classification, seizure detection, mixture of experts, discrete wavelet transform, wavelet feature extraction, expectation-maximization algorithm, gating function, epilepsy diagnosis, epileptiform discharges
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
