Application of wrapper approach and composite classifier to the stock trend prediction
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some previous studies identify opportunities to trade profitably on model predictions.
“Some studies also identify opportunities to trade profitably on model predictions (Chang et al., 2009; de Oliveira et al., 2013; Doeksen, Abraham, Thomas, & Paprzycki, 2005; C.-J. Huang et al., 2008; Huck, 2010; Kara, Acar Boyacioglu, & Baykan, 2011; Schumaker & Chen, 2009).”
From Bridging the divide in financial market forecasting: machine learners vs. financial economists (2016) · cites this paper as C.-J. Huang et al., 2008
The study focuses on predicting national stock indices because these indices are used in the majority of previous machine learning studies that predict direction of price changes.
“We have focused on predicting national stock indices because these indices are used in the majority of previous ML studies that predict direction of price changes (e.g. Bodyanskiy & Popov, 2006; de Oliveira, Nobre, & Zárate, 2013; C.-J. Huang, Yang, & Chuang, 2008; W. Huang, Nakamori, & Wang, 2005; Pan, Tilakaratne, & Yearwood, 2005; Qian & Rasheed, 2007).”
From Bridging the divide in financial market forecasting: machine learners vs. financial economists (2016) · cites this paper as C.-J. Huang, Yang, & Chuang, 2008
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 167
- Authors
- HUANG, C., YANG, D., & CHUANG, Y.
- Affiliations
- National Dong Hwa University (TW)
- Corresponding author
- HUANG, C
- Venue
- Expert Systems with Applications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-05
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2870-2878
- ISSN
- 0957-4174 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1965805826
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 5.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Expert Systems with Applications (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Council
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Stock Market Forecasting Methods
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Forecasting Techniques and Applications
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Keywords
- stock trend prediction, stock market prediction, feature selection, wrapper approach, technical indicators, ensemble voting classifier, Korean stock market, Taiwan stock market
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
