The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A multi-criteria interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making with Choquet integral-based TOPSIS
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Zadeh, L. A. (1965) · Information and Control · doi:10.1016/s0019-9958(65)90241-x · Cited by 67,855
Zadeh, L. A. (1996) · Cited by 46,844
Atanassov, K. T. (1986) · Fuzzy Sets and Systems · doi:10.1016/s0165-0114(86)80034-3 · Cited by 16,465
Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications
Chen, S.-J. J., Hwang, C. L., Beckmann, M. J., & Krelle, W. E. (1981) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 8,207
On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decisionmaking
Yager, R. R. (1988) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/21.87068 · Cited by 7,289
Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment
Chen, C.-T. (2000) · Fuzzy Sets and Systems · doi:10.1016/s0165-0114(97)00377-1 · Cited by 3,844
Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets
Atanassov, K., & Gargov, G. (1989) · Fuzzy Sets and Systems · doi:10.1016/0165-0114(89)90205-4 · Cited by 2,916
Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity
(2004) · Uncertainty in Economic Theory · doi:10.4324/9780203358061-10 · Cited by 2,510
Subjective Probability and Expected Utility without Additivity
Schmeidler, D. (1989) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1911053 · Cited by 2,303
Atanassov, K. T. (1999) · Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-7908-1870-3_1 · Cited by 2,165
Cited by
A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications
Behzadian, M., Khanmohammadi Otaghsara, S., Yazdani, M., & Ignatius, J. (2012) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.056 · Cited by 2,690
Spherical fuzzy sets and spherical fuzzy TOPSIS method
Kutlu Gündoğdu, F., & Kahraman, C. (2019) · Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.3233/jifs-181401 · Cited by 965
Zhang, X. (2016) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2015.10.012 · Cited by 459
Spherical fuzzy sets and their applications in multi-attribute decision making problems
Ashraf, S., Abdullah, S., Mahmood, T., Ghani, F., & Mahmood, T. (2019) · Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.3233/jifs-172009 · Cited by 407
Metadata
- Authors
- Tan, C.
- Venue
- Expert Systems with Applications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-04
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 3023-3033
- ISSN
- 0957-4174 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1998031161
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 16.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A multi-criteria interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making with Choquet integral-based TOPSIS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.08.092
- The paper
- Tan, C. (2011). A multi-criteria interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making with Choquet integral-based TOPSIS. Expert Systems with Applications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.08.092
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
