Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 589

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A novel hybrid intrusion detection method integrating anomaly detection with misuse detection

Kim, Gisung, Lee, Seungmin, Kim, Sehun·2014·Expert Systems with Applications

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eswa.2013.08.066

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Barbara, D., Couto, J., Jajodia, S., Popyack, L., & Wu, N. (2001). ADAM: Detecting intrusions by data mining. In Proceedings of the IEEE workshop on information assurance and security (pp. 11–16).
  2. Chang, 2010, Tree decomposition for large-scale SVM problems, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 10, 2935
  3. Depren, 2005, An intelligent intrusion detection system for anomaly and misuse detection in computer networks, Expert Systems with Applications, 29, 713, 10.1016/j.eswa.2005.05.002 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Hwang, 2007, Hybrid intrusion detection with weighted signature generation over anomalous Internet episodes, IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 4, 41, 10.1109/TDSC.2007.9 · DOI
  5. Manevitz, 2002, One-class SVMs for document classification, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2, 139
  6. Perdisci, R., Gu, G., & Lee, W. (2006). Using an ensemble of one-class SVM classifiers to harden payload-based anomaly detection systems. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on data mining (pp. 488–498). · DOI · Paper page
  7. Quinlan, 1996, Learning decision tree classifier, ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 28, 71, 10.1145/234313.234346 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Shin, 2005, One-class support vector machines: An application in machine fault detection and classification, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 48, 395, 10.1016/j.cie.2005.01.009 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Song, 2009, Unsupervised anomaly detection based on clustering and multiple one-class SVM, IEICE Transactions on Communications, E92-B, 1982, 10.1587/transcom.E92.B.1981 · DOI
  10. Tavallaee, M., Bagheri, E., Lu, W., & Ghorbani, A. (2009). A detailed analysis of the KDD CUP 99 data set. In Proceeding of the IEEE symposium on computational intelligence for security and defense applications (pp. 53–58). · DOI · Paper page
  11. Zhang, J., & Zulkernine, M. (2006). A hybrid network intrusion detection technique using random forests. In Proceedings of the first international conference on availability, reliability and security (pp. 262–269). · DOI

Cited by

See all 589

Metadata

Authors
Kim, G., Lee, S., & Kim, S.
Venue
Expert Systems with Applications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-03
Volume
41
Issue
4
Pages
1690-1700
ISSN
0957-4174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2066832805
Cited by
589
References
3
FWCI
30.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A novel hybrid intrusion detection method integrating anomaly detection with misuse detection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.08.066
The paper
Kim, G., Lee, S., & Kim, S. (2014). A novel hybrid intrusion detection method integrating anomaly detection with misuse detection. Expert Systems with Applications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.08.066

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.