The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Feature selection using Joint Mutual Information Maximisation
Open accessAbstract
Feature selection is used in many application areas relevant to expert and intelligent systems, such as data mining and machine learning, image processing, anomaly detection, bioinformatics and natural language processing. Feature selection based on information theory is a popular approach due its computational efficiency, scalability in terms of the dataset dimensionality, and independence from the classifier. Common drawbacks of this approach are the lack of information about the interaction between the features and the classifier, and the selection of redundant and irrelevant features. The latter is due to the limitations of the employed goal functions leading to overestimation of the feature significance. To address this problem, this article introduces two new nonlinear feature selection methods, namely Joint Mutual Information Maximisation (JMIM) and Normalised Joint Mutual Information Maximisation (NJMIM); both these methods use mutual information and the ‘maximum of the minimum’ criterion, which alleviates the problem of overestimation of the feature significance as demonstrated both theoretically and experimentally. The proposed methods are compared using eleven publically available datasets with five competing methods. The results demonstrate that the JMIM method outperforms the other methods on most tested public datasets, reducing the relative average classification error by almost 6% in comparison to the next best performing method. The statistical significance of the results is confirmed by the ANOVA test. Moreover, this method produces the best trade-off between accuracy and stability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Elements of Information Theory
Cover, T. M., & Thomas, J. A. (2001) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0471200611 · Cited by 36,808
UCI Machine Learning Repository
Asuncion, A. (2007) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 24,156
(2012) · Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_5195 · Cited by 19,370
Elements of Information Theory
Cover, T. M., & Thomas, J. A. (2005) · doi:10.1002/047174882x · Cited by 13,791
Turk, M., & Pentland, A. (1991) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.1991.3.1.71 · Cited by 13,733
The Hungarian method for the assignment problem
Kuhn, H. W. (1955) · Naval Research Logistics Quarterly · doi:10.1002/nav.3800020109 · Cited by 13,120
Peng, H., Long, F., & Ding, C. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2005.159 · Cited by 10,544
An introduction to variable and feature selection
GuyonIsabelle, & ElisseeffAndré (2003) · Journal of Machine Learning Research · doi:10.5555/944919.944968 · Cited by 7,715
Statistical pattern recognition: a review
Jain, A. K., Duin, P. W., & Mao, J. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.824819 · Cited by 6,767
An Introduction to Variable and Feature Selection.
Guyon, I., & Elisseeff, A. (2003) · Cited by 6,576
Cited by
A survey on wearable sensor modality centred human activity recognition in health care
Wang, Y., Cang, S., & Yu, H. (2019) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2019.04.057 · Cited by 409
A novel community detection based genetic algorithm for feature selection
(2021) · doi:10.1186/s40537-020-00398-3 · Cited by 197
Benchmark of filter methods for feature selection in high-dimensional gene expression survival data
Bommert, A., Welchowski, T., Schmid, M., & Rahnenführer, J. (2022) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbab354 · Cited by 182
Simultaneously Detecting and Counting Dense Vehicles From Drone Images
Li, W., Li, H., Wu, Q., Chen, X., & Ngan, K. N. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · doi:10.1109/tie.2019.2899548 · Cited by 96
Classification of three anesthesia stages based on near-infrared spectroscopy signals
Liu, Z., Si, L., Shi, S., Li, J., Zhu, J., Lee, W. H., Lo, S.-L., Yan, X., Chen, B., Fu, F., et al. (2024) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2024.3409163 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Bennasar, M., Hicks, Y., & Setchi, R.
- Venue
- Expert Systems with Applications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-12
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 8520-8532
- ISSN
- 0957-4174 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2143043751
- Cited by
- 659
- References
- 45
- FWCI
- 33.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Feature selection using Joint Mutual Information Maximisation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.07.007
- The paper
- Bennasar, M., Hicks, Y., & Setchi, R. (2015). Feature selection using Joint Mutual Information Maximisation. Expert Systems with Applications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.07.007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.