The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Privacy-preserving collaborative recommendations based on random perturbations
Open accessAbstract
We propose a solution to the privacy problem found in collaborative filtering.Our proposed method is based on multiple levels.We have evaluated our method using five real datasets and well known metrics. Collaborative recommender systems offer a solution to the information overload problem found in online environments such as e-commerce. The use of collaborative filtering, the most widely used recommendation method, gives rise to potential privacy issues. In addition, the user ratings utilized in collaborative filtering systems to recommend products or services must be protected. The purpose of this research is to provide a solution to the privacy concerns of collaborative filtering users, while maintaining high accuracy of recommendations. This paper proposes a multi-level privacy-preserving method for collaborative filtering systems by perturbing each rating before it is submitted to the server. The perturbation method is based on multiple levels and different ranges of random values for each level. Before the submission of each rating, the privacy level and the perturbation range are selected randomly from a fixed range of privacy levels. The proposed privacy method has been experimentally evaluated with the results showing that with a small decrease of utility, user privacy can be protected, while the proposed approach offers practical and effective results.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Additionally, the recommendation accuracy may be compromised due to the added noise [167].”
From A Deep Dive into Fairness, Bias, Threats, and Privacy in Recommender Systems: Insights and Future Research (2024) · cites this paper as [167]
Citations
Cites
Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems
Herlocker, J. L., Konstan, J. A., Terveen, L. G., & Riedl, J. T. (2004) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/963770.963772 · Cited by 5,798
(2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85820-3 · Cited by 3,761
An Algorithmic Framework for Performing Collaborative Filtering
Herlocker, J. L., Konstan, J. A., Borchers, A., & Riedl, J. (2017) · ACM SIGIR Forum · doi:10.1145/3130348.3130372 · Cited by 2,512
Evaluating Recommendation Systems
Shani, G., & Gunawardana, A. (2011) · Recommender Systems Handbook · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85820-3_8 · Cited by 1,325
Recommender Systems: An Introduction
Jannach, D., Zanker, M., Felfernig, A., & FRIEDRICH, G. E. (2010) · Cited by 1,097
Collaborative Filtering Recommender Systems
Ekstrand, M. D. (2011) · Foundations and Trends® in Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1561/1100000009 · Cited by 1,037
Shi, Y., Larson, M., & Hanjalic, A. (2014) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2556270 · Cited by 806
Recommender systems: from algorithms to user experience
Konstan, J. A., & Riedl, J. (2012) · User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction · doi:10.1007/s11257-011-9112-x · Cited by 762
Practical data-oriented microaggregation for statistical disclosure control
Domingo-Ferrer, J., & Mateo-Sanz, J. M. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/69.979982 · Cited by 576
A General Survey of Privacy-Preserving Data Mining Models and Algorithms
Aggarwal, C. C., & Yu, P. S. (2008) · Advances in Database Systems · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-70992-5_2 · Cited by 469
Cited by
Differentially private user-based collaborative filtering recommendation based on k-means clustering
Chen, Z., Wang, Y., Zhang, S., Zhong, H., & Chen, L. (2021) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114366 · Cited by 42
A systematic review of privacy techniques in recommendation systems
Ogunseyi, T. B., Avoussoukpo, C. B., & Jiang, Y. (2023) · International Journal of Information Security · doi:10.1007/s10207-023-00710-1 · Cited by 27
Kashani, S. M. Z., & Hamidzadeh, J. (2020) · Soft Computing · doi:10.1007/s00500-019-04605-z · Cited by 25
Roy, F., Ding, X., Choo, K. K. R., & Zhou, P. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.12651 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Polatidis, N., Georgiadis, C. K., Pimenidis, E., & Mouratidis, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Macedonia (GR)
- University of the West of England (GB)
- University of Brighton (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Polatidis, Nikolaos
- Venue
- Expert Systems with Applications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-04
- Volume
- 71
- Pages
- 18-25
- ISSN
- 0957-4174 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2552883359
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 6.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- eprints.uwe.ac.uk
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- Locations
- Expert Systems with Applications (publishedVersion)
- UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- University of Brighton Repository (University of Brighton) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Keywords
- privacy-preserving recommendation, collaborative filtering, collaborative recommender systems, random perturbations, user privacy, recommendation accuracy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.