The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multi-objective multi-robot path planning in continuous environment using an enhanced genetic algorithm
Abstract
Abstract This paper presents a hybrid approach for path planning of multiple mobile robots in continuous environments. For this purpose, first, an innovative Artificial Potential Field (APF) algorithm is presented to find all feasible paths between the start and destination locations in a discrete gridded environment. Next, an enhanced Genetic Algorithm (EGA) is developed to improve the initial paths in continuous space and find the optimal path between start and destination locations. The proposed APF works based on a time-efficient deterministic scheme to find a set of feasible initial paths and is guaranteed to find a feasible path if one exists. The EGA utilizes five customized crossover and mutation operators to improve the initial paths. In this paper, path length, smoothness, and safety are combined to form a multi-objective path planning problem. In addition, the proposed method is extended to deal with multiple mobile robot path planning problem. For this purpose, a new term is added to the objective function which measures the distance between robots and a collision removal operator is added to the EGA to remove possible collision between paths. To assess the efficiency of the proposed algorithm, 12 planar environments with different sizes and complexities were examined. Evaluations showed that the control parameters of the proposed algorithm do not affect the performance of the EGA considerably. Moreover, a comparative study has been made between the proposed algorithm, A*, PRM, B-RRT and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO). The comparative study showed that the proposed algorithm outperforms PSO as well as well-recognized deterministic (A*) and probabilistic (PRM and B-RRT) path planning algorithms in terms of path length, run time, and success rate. Finally, simulations proved the efficiency of the proposed algorithm for a four-robot path planning problem. In this case, not only the proposed algorithm determined collision-free paths, but also it found near optimal solution for all robots.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A note on two problems in connexion with graphs
Dijkstra, E. W. (1959) · Numerische Mathematik · doi:10.1007/bf01386390 · Cited by 24,043
A Formal Basis for the Heuristic Determination of Minimum Cost Paths
Hart, P., Nilsson, N., & Raphael, B. (1968) · IEEE Transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tssc.1968.300136 · Cited by 12,738
The complexity of robot motion planning
Canny, J. (1988) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,375
Heuristic approaches in robot path planning: A survey
Mac, T. T., Copot, C., Tran, D. T., & De Keyser, R. (2016) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/j.robot.2016.08.001 · Cited by 641
Garcia, M. A. P., Montiel, O., Castillo, O., Sepúlveda, R., & Melin, P. (2009) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2009.02.014 · Cited by 394
Mobile robot path planning using artificial bee colony and evolutionary programming
Contreras-Cruz, M. A., Ayala-Ramirez, V., & Hernandez-Belmonte, U. H. (2015) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2015.01.067 · Cited by 295
Autonomous UAV path planning and estimation
Tisdale, J., Kim, Z., & Hedrick, J. (2009) · IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine · doi:10.1109/mra.2009.932529 · Cited by 275
Mac, T. T., Copot, C., Tran, D. T., & Keyser, R. D. (2017) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2017.05.012 · Cited by 226
Classic And Heuristic Approaches In Robot Motion Planning A Chronological Review
Masehian, E., & Sedighizadeh, D. (2007) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.1074971 · Cited by 209
Cited by
Path planning techniques for mobile robots: Review and prospect
Liu, L., Wang, X., Yang, X., Liu, H., Li, J., & Wang, P. (2023) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120254 · Cited by 707
An intelligence-based hybrid PSO-SA for mobile robot path planning in warehouse
Lin, S., Liu, A., Wang, J., & Kong, X. (2023) · Journal of Computational Science · doi:10.1016/j.jocs.2022.101938 · Cited by 150
A Fast Large-Scale Path Planning Method on Lunar DEM Using Distributed Tile Pyramid Strategy
Hong, Z., Tu, B., Tong, X., Pan, H., Zhou, R., Zhang, Y., Han, Y., Wang, J., Yang, S., & Ma, Z. (2023) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/jstars.2022.3226527 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Nazarahari, M., Khanmirza, E., & Doostie, S.
- Venue
- Expert Systems with Applications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-01
- Volume
- 115
- Pages
- 106-120
- ISSN
- 0957-4174 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2887439418
- Cited by
- 454
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 15.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multi-objective multi-robot path planning in continuous environment using an enhanced genetic algorithm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.08.008
- The paper
- Nazarahari, M., Khanmirza, E., & Doostie, S. (2019). Multi-objective multi-robot path planning in continuous environment using an enhanced genetic algorithm. Expert Systems with Applications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.08.008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.