Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 382

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An end-to-end deep learning approach to MI-EEG signal classification for BCIs

Open access
Dose, Hauke, Møller, Jakob S., Iversen, Helle K., Puthusserypady, Sadasivan·2018·Expert Systems with Applications

Abstract

Abstract Goal: To develop and implement a Deep Learning (DL) approach for an electroencephalogram (EEG) based Motor Imagery (MI) Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) system that could potentially be used to improve the current stroke rehabilitation strategies. Method: The DL model is using Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) layers for learning generalized features and dimension reduction, while a conventional Fully Connected (FC) layer is used for classification. Together they build a unified end-to-end model that can be applied to raw EEG signals. This previously proposed model was applied to a new set of data to validate its robustness against data variations. Furthermore, it was extended by subject-specific adaptation. Lastly, an analysis of the learned filters provides insights into how such a model derives a classification decision. Results: The selected global classifier reached 80.38%, 69.82%, and 58.58% mean accuracies for datasets with two, three, and four classes, respectively, validated using 5-fold crossvalidation. As a novel approach in this context, transfer learning was used to adapt the global classifier to single individuals improving the overall mean accuracy to 86.49%, 79.25%, and 68.51%, respectively. The global models were trained on 3s segments of EEG data from different subjects than they were tested on, which proved the generalization performance of the model. Conclusion: The results are comparable with the reported accuracy values in related studies and the presented model outperforms the results in the literature on the same underlying data. Given that the model can learn features from data without having to use specialized feature extraction methods, DL should be considered as an alternative to established EEG classification methods, if enough data is available.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eswa.2018.08.031

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Cited by

See all 382

Metadata

Authors
Dose, H., Møller, J. S., Iversen, H. K., & Puthusserypady, S.
Venue
Expert Systems with Applications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-12
Volume
114
Pages
532-542
ISSN
0957-4174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2888355470
Cited by
382
References
43
FWCI
14.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An end-to-end deep learning approach to MI-EEG signal classification for BCIs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.08.031
The paper
Dose, H., Møller, J. S., Iversen, H. K., & Puthusserypady, S. (2018). An end-to-end deep learning approach to MI-EEG signal classification for BCIs. Expert Systems with Applications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.08.031

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.