The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An end-to-end deep learning approach to MI-EEG signal classification for BCIs
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Goal: To develop and implement a Deep Learning (DL) approach for an electroencephalogram (EEG) based Motor Imagery (MI) Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) system that could potentially be used to improve the current stroke rehabilitation strategies. Method: The DL model is using Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) layers for learning generalized features and dimension reduction, while a conventional Fully Connected (FC) layer is used for classification. Together they build a unified end-to-end model that can be applied to raw EEG signals. This previously proposed model was applied to a new set of data to validate its robustness against data variations. Furthermore, it was extended by subject-specific adaptation. Lastly, an analysis of the learned filters provides insights into how such a model derives a classification decision. Results: The selected global classifier reached 80.38%, 69.82%, and 58.58% mean accuracies for datasets with two, three, and four classes, respectively, validated using 5-fold crossvalidation. As a novel approach in this context, transfer learning was used to adapt the global classifier to single individuals improving the overall mean accuracy to 86.49%, 79.25%, and 68.51%, respectively. The global models were trained on 3s segments of EEG data from different subjects than they were tested on, which proved the generalization performance of the model. Conclusion: The results are comparable with the reported accuracy values in related studies and the presented model outperforms the results in the literature on the same underlying data. Given that the model can learn features from data without having to use specialized feature extraction methods, DL should be considered as an alternative to established EEG classification methods, if enough data is available.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Goldberger, A. L., Amaral, L. A. N., Glass, L., Hausdorff, J. M., Ivanov, P. C., Mark, R. G., Mietus, J. E., Moody, G. B., Peng, C.-K., & Stanley, H. E. (2000) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.101.23.e215 · Cited by 14,809
(2016) · Cited by 11,679
Deep learning with convolutional neural networks for EEG decoding and visualization
Schirrmeister, R. T., Springenberg, J. T., Fiederer, L. D. J., Glasstetter, M., Eggensperger, K., Tangermann, M., Hutter, F., Burgard, W., & Ball, T. (2017) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23730 · Cited by 3,751
BCI2000: A General-Purpose Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) System
Schalk, G., McFarland, D. J., Hinterberger, T., Birbaumer, N., & Wolpaw, J. R. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2004.827072 · Cited by 3,024
Filter Bank Common Spatial Pattern (FBCSP) in Brain-Computer Interface
Ang, K. K., Chin, Z. Y., Zhang, H., & Guan, C. (2008) · 2008 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.2008.4634130 · Cited by 1,514
Brain–computer interfaces for communication and rehabilitation
Chaudhary, U., Birbaumer, N., & Ramos-Murguialday, A. (2016) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2016.113 · Cited by 928 · cited 1×
“, 2009)), to stem cells and pharmacological therapy (Chaudhary et al., 2016), to the usage of Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) systems have emerged to tackle the limitations of current stroke rehabilitation strategies/methods.”
BackgroundA novel deep learning approach for classification of EEG motor imagery signals
Tabar, Y. R., & Halici, U. (2017) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2560/14/1/016003 · Cited by 859
Cited by
Deep learning for electroencephalogram (EEG) classification tasks: a review
Craik, A., He, Y., & Contreras-Vidal, J. L. (2019) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ab0ab5 · Cited by 1,758
Deep Representation-Based Domain Adaptation for Nonstationary EEG Classification
Zhao, H., Zheng, Q., Ma, K., Li, H., & Zheng, Y. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2020.3010780 · Cited by 253
Benefits of deep learning classification of continuous noninvasive brain–computer interface control
Stieger, J. R., Engel, S. A., Suma, D., & He, B. (2021) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ac0584 · Cited by 55
Subject adaptation convolutional neural network for EEG-based motor imagery classification
Liu, S., Zhang, J., Wang, A., Wu, H., Zhao, Q., & Long, J. (2022) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ac9c94 · Cited by 29
Guo, S., Wang, Y., Liu, Y., Zhang, X., & Tang, B. (2025) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2025.107756 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Dose, H., Møller, J. S., Iversen, H. K., & Puthusserypady, S.
- Venue
- Expert Systems with Applications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-12
- Volume
- 114
- Pages
- 532-542
- ISSN
- 0957-4174 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2888355470
- Cited by
- 382
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 14.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An end-to-end deep learning approach to MI-EEG signal classification for BCIs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.08.031
- The paper
- Dose, H., Møller, J. S., Iversen, H. K., & Puthusserypady, S. (2018). An end-to-end deep learning approach to MI-EEG signal classification for BCIs. Expert Systems with Applications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.08.031
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.