The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A hybrid self-adaptive sine cosine algorithm with opposition based learning
Abstract
Abstract Real-world optimization problems demand an efficient meta-heuristic algorithm which maintains the diversity of solutions and properly exploits the search space of the problem to find the global optimal solution. Sine Cosine Algorithm (SCA) is a recently developed population-based meta-heuristic algorithm for solving global optimization problems. SCA uses the characteristics of sine and cosine trigonometric functions to update the solutions. But, like other population-based optimization algorithms, SCA also suffers the problem of low diversity, stagnation in local optima and skipping of true solutions. Therefore, in the present work, an attempt has been made towards the eradication of these issues, by proposing a modified version of SCA. The proposed algorithm is named as modified Sine Cosine Algorithm (m-SCA). In m-SCA, the opposite population is generated using opposite numbers based on perturbation rate to jump out from the local optima. Secondly, in the search equations of SCA self-adaptive component is added to exploit all the promising search regions which are pre-visited. To evaluate the effectiveness in solving the global optimization problems, m-SCA has been tested on two sets of benchmark problems – classical set of 23 well-known benchmark problems and standard IEEE CEC 2014 benchmark test problems. In the paper, the performance of proposed algorithm m-SCA is also tested on five engineering optimization problems. The conducted statistical, convergence and average distance analysis demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed algorithm to determine the efficient solution of real-life global optimization problems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Holland, J. H. (1992) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1090.001.0001 · Cited by 47,002
Storn, R., & Price, K. (1997) · Journal of Global Optimization · doi:10.1023/a:1008202821328 · Cited by 29,569
Mirjalili, S., Mirjalili, S. M., & Lewis, A. (2014) · Advances in Engineering Software · doi:10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.12.007 · Cited by 19,343
A new optimizer using particle swarm theory
Eberhart, R., & Kennedy, J. (2002) · MHS'95. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science · doi:10.1109/mhs.1995.494215 · Cited by 16,067
The Whale Optimization Algorithm
Mirjalili, S., & Lewis, A. (2016) · Advances in Engineering Software · doi:10.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.01.008 · Cited by 14,581
No free lunch theorems for optimization
Wolpert, D. H., & Macready, W. G. (1997) · IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1109/4235.585893 · Cited by 14,237
A modified particle swarm optimizer
Shi, Y., & Eberhart, R. (2002) · 1998 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation Proceedings. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence (Cat. No.98TH8360) · doi:10.1109/icec.1998.699146 · Cited by 10,229
Karaboga, D., & Basturk, B. (2007) · Journal of Global Optimization · doi:10.1007/s10898-007-9149-x · Cited by 7,651
GSA: A Gravitational Search Algorithm
Rashedi, E., Nezamabadi-pour, H., & Saryazdi, S. (2009) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2009.03.004 · Cited by 7,358
(2019) · Handbook of Machine Learning · doi:10.1142/9789811205675_0004 · Cited by 6,270
Metadata
- Authors
- Gupta, S., & Deep, K.
- Venue
- Expert Systems with Applications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 119
- Pages
- 210-230
- ISSN
- 0957-4174 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2898785807
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 59
- FWCI
- 15.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A hybrid self-adaptive sine cosine algorithm with opposition based learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.10.050
- The paper
- Gupta, S., & Deep, K. (2019). A hybrid self-adaptive sine cosine algorithm with opposition based learning. Expert Systems with Applications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.10.050
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.