The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Convolutional neural network improvement for breast cancer classification
Abstract
Abstract Traditionally, physicians need to manually delineate the suspected breast cancer area. Numerous studies have mentioned that manual segmentation takes time, and depends on the machine and the operator. The algorithm called Convolutional Neural Network Improvement for Breast Cancer Classification (CNNI-BCC) is presented to assist medical experts in breast cancer diagnosis in timely manner. The CNNI-BCC uses a convolutional neural network that improves the breast cancer lesion classification in order to help experts for breast cancer diagnosis. CNNI-BCC can classify incoming breast cancer medical images into malignant, benign, and healthy patients. The application of present algorithm can assist in classification of mammographic medical images into benign patient, malignant patient and healthy patient without prior information of the presence of a cancerous lesion. The presented method aims to help medical experts for the classification of breast cancer lesion through the implementation of convolutional neural network for the classification of breast cancer. CNNI-BCC can categorize incoming medical images as malignant, benign or normal patient with sensitivity, accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and specificity of 89.47%, 90.50%, 0.901 ± 0.0314 and 90.71% respectively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Hierarchical Feature Representation and Multimodal Fusion with Deep Learning for AD/MCI Diagnosis
Suk, H.-I., Lee, S.-W., & Shen, D. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.077 · Cited by 968
Cheng, J.-Z., Ni, D., Chou, Y.-H., Qin, J., Tiu, C.-M., Chang, Y.-C., Huang, C.-S., Shen, D., & Chen, C.-M. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep24454 · Cited by 755
Cited by
Statistical and machine learning models in credit scoring: A systematic literature survey
Dastile, X., Celik, T., & Potsane, M. (2020) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106263 · Cited by 404
Deep and machine learning techniques for medical imaging-based breast cancer: A comprehensive review
Houssein, E. H., Emam, M. M., Ali, A. A., & Suganthan, P. N. (2021) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114161 · Cited by 404
Breast Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Using Mammographic Data: Systematic Review
Gardezi, S. J. S., Elazab, A., Lei, B., & Wang, T. (2019) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/14464 · Cited by 268
Talaat, F. M., Gamel, S. A., El-Balka, R. M., Shehata, M., & ZainEldin, H. (2024) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers16213668 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Ting, F. F., Tan, Y. J., & Sim, K. S.
- Venue
- Expert Systems with Applications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 120
- Pages
- 103-115
- ISSN
- 0957-4174 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2900144270
- Cited by
- 449
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 21.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Convolutional neural network improvement for breast cancer classification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.11.008
- The paper
- Ting, F. F., Tan, Y. J., & Sim, K. S. (2019). Convolutional neural network improvement for breast cancer classification. Expert Systems with Applications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.11.008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.