Detection of malicious social bots: A survey and a refined taxonomy
Abstract
Abstract Social bots represent a new generation of bots that make use of online social networks (OSNs) as command and control (C&C) channels. Malicious social bots have been used as tools for launching large-scale spam campaigns, promoting low-cap stocks, manipulating users’ digital influence, and conducting political astroturfing. Recent studies in this area either focus only on general security issues related to social networks or on coarse-grained categorization to support detection approaches. This survey aims to provide a comprehensive analysis from a social network perspective. To this end, we first categorize social bot attacks at different stages, then provide an overview of different types of social bots. Next, we propose a refined taxonomy that shows how different techniques within a category are related or differ from each other, followed by a detailed discussion of the strengths and limitations of each method. Following this, we review the existing datasets and summarize the results of empirical investigations. Finally, we highlight the limitations of existing detection approaches and suggest future directions for further improvement. Our study should help OSN administrators and researchers understand the destructive potential of malicious social bots and improve upon the current defensive strategies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 218 · Cited by 94
- Authors
- Latah, M.
- Affiliations
- Özyeğin University (TR)
- Corresponding author
- Latah, Majd
- ORCID
- Latah, Majd
- Venue
- Expert Systems with Applications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-08
- Volume
- 151
- Pages
- 113383
- ISSN
- 0957-4174 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3011025032
- Semantic Scholar
- a20018fcbd6d8cdcf894b5f596c2a44b09b3da07
- Cited by
- 94
- References
- 218
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 4 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 12.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Expert Systems with Applications (publishedVersion)
- ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology (The Electrochemical Society) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
- Keywords
- social bot detection, social networking sites, spam campaigns, astroturfing, political manipulation, command and control channels, social network security
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review