Cited by 28Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityChaos-based Image/Signal EncryptionCloud Data Security Solutions

Chaotic and Paillier secure image data sharing based on blockchain and cloud security

Singh, C. Edward Jaya, Sunitha, C. Adline·2022·Expert Systems with Applications

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116874

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The BC-PMA scheme of [151] improves the accuracy of authentication and reduces the false positive rate and calculation cost.

    “This scheme not only improves the accuracy of authentication but also reduces the false positive rate and calculation cost.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Singh, C. E. J., & Sunitha, C. A.
Affiliations
Manonmaniam Sundaranar University (IN)
Corresponding author
Singh, C. Edward Jaya
Venue
Expert Systems with Applications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-07
Volume
198
Pages
116874
ISSN
0957-4174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4220822908
Cited by
28
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 2
FWCI
6.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Expert Systems with Applications (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Data Security Solutions
Keywords
image data sharing, blockchain, Paillier cryptosystem, chaotic maps, cat map, image registration, smart contracts, cloud security, Internet of Things, image authentication, data integrity, false positive rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review