Cited by 7Recommender Systems and TechniquesInformation Retrieval and Search Behaviorscientometrics and bibliometrics research

Improved literature recommendation system through the fusion mode of conformity bias elimination and keyword preference

Pan, Qingwei, Li, Shuqing, Zheng, Tiansheng, Ma, Fumin, Huang, Jinwang·2024·Expert Systems with Applications

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eswa.2024.123227

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Pan, Q., Li, S., Zheng, T., Ma, F., & Huang, J.
Affiliations
Nanjing University of Finance and Economics (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Li, Shuqing
  • Zheng, Tiansheng
Venue
Expert Systems with Applications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-08
Volume
247
Pages
123227
ISSN
0957-4174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391057910
Cited by
7
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2
FWCI
2.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Expert Systems with Applications (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Key Research and Development Program of Jiangxi Province
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61973151)
  • Chinese Academy of Engineering
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • Jiangsu Province Department of Science and Technology (BE2021001-4)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Keywords
literature recommendation, conformity bias, keyword selection, data fusion, user access behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review