Dynamic decision making for situational awareness using drones: Requirements, identification and comparison of decision support methods
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Publications [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20] report the use of the AHP method to prioritize and optimize processes in several areas.
“Publications [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20] report the use of the AHP method to prioritize and optimize processes in several areas.”
From Multicriteria Methodology for Prioritizing Predictive Maintenance Using RPASs (Drones) with Thermal Cameras on Transmission Lines (2025) · cites this paper as [16]
The available passages labeled Abstract list AHP as a keyword, but do not describe its use to prioritize or optimize processes. Searches for AHP, prioritization, and applications across areas returned only bibliographic material, so our copy does not establish the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe authors of [14,15,16,17] describe the use of RPASs to clean solar panels, define the need to purchase a drone, in maritime installations, and for belief management in internet technology, respectively, applications that all used the AHP method to optimize and prioritize processes, sometimes in combination with other MCDA techniques.
“The authors of [14,15,16,17] describe the use of RPASs to clean solar panels, define the need to purchase a drone, in maritime installations, and for belief management in internet technology, respectively, applications that all used the AHP method to optimize and prioritize processes, sometimes in combination with other multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) techniques.”
From Multicriteria Methodology for Prioritizing Predictive Maintenance Using RPASs (Drones) with Thermal Cameras on Transmission Lines (2025) · cites this paper as [16]
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 50 · Cited by 8
- Authors
- Duxbury, D. J., Paton, N. W., & Keane, J. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Manchester (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Duxbury, Dominic J.
- Venue
- Expert Systems with Applications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-10
- Volume
- 252
- Pages
- 124057
- ISSN
- 0957-4174 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4396696518
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6
- FWCI
- 2.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- Expert Systems with Applications (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Decision Support System Applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Vehicle Routing Optimization Methods
- Keywords
- dynamic decision support, situational awareness, multi-criteria decision making, TOPSIS, analytic hierarchy process, PROMETHEE, weighted product method, dynamic genetic algorithm, port management, drone deployment, real-time decision making, preference specification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
