Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 357

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 128 of the 128 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Physics-informed machine learning: A comprehensive review on applications in anomaly detection and condition monitoring

Open access
Wu, Yuandi, Sicard, Brett, Gadsden, Stephen Andrew·2024·Expert Systems with Applications

Abstract

Condition monitoring plays a vital role in ensuring the reliability and optimal performance of various engineering systems. Traditional methods for condition monitoring rely on physics-based models and statistical analysis techniques. However, these approaches often face challenges in dealing with complex systems and the limited availability of accurate physical models. In recent years, physics-informed machine learning (PIML) has emerged as a promising approach for condition monitoring, combining the strengths of physics-based modelling and data-driven machine learning. This study presents a comprehensive overview of PIML techniques in the context of condition monitoring. The central concept driving PIML is the incorporation of known physical laws and constraints into machine learning algorithms, enabling them to learn from available data while remaining consistent with physical principles. Through fusing domain knowledge with data-driven learning, PIML methods offer enhanced accuracy and interpretability in comparison to purely data-driven approaches. In this comprehensive survey, detailed examinations are performed with regard to the methodology by which known physical principles are integrated within machine learning frameworks, as well as their suitability for specific tasks within condition monitoring. Incorporation of physical knowledge into the ML model may be realized in a variety of methods, with each having its unique advantages and drawbacks. The distinct advantages and limitations of each methodology for the integration of physics within data-driven models are detailed, considering factors such as computational efficiency, model interpretability, and generalizability to different systems in condition monitoring and fault detection. Several case studies and works of literature utilizing this emerging concept are presented to demonstrate the efficacy of PIML in condition monitoring applications. From the literature reviewed, the versatility and potential of PIML in condition monitoring may be demonstrated. Novel PIML methods offer an innovative solution for addressing the complexities of condition monitoring and associated challenges. This comprehensive survey helps form the foundation for future work in the field. As the technology continues to advance, PIML is expected to play a crucial role in enhancing maintenance strategies, system reliability, and overall operational efficiency in engineering systems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124678

Cites

128 of 128 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 128 references

Metadata

Authors
Wu, Y., Sicard, B., & Gadsden, S. A.
Venue
Expert Systems with Applications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-12
Volume
255
Pages
124678
ISSN
0957-4174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4400340432
Cited by
357
References
128
FWCI
56.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physics-informed machine learning: A comprehensive review on applications in anomaly detection and condition monitoring. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124678
The paper
Wu, Y., Sicard, B., & Gadsden, S. A. (2024). Physics-informed machine learning: A comprehensive review on applications in anomaly detection and condition monitoring. Expert Systems with Applications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124678

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.