Cited by 82Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

EL-YOLO: An efficient and lightweight low-altitude aerial objects detector for onboard applications

Xue, Chen, Xia, Yuelong, Wu, Mingjie, Chen, Zaiqing, Cheng, Feiyan, Yun, Lijun·2024·Expert Systems with Applications

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124848

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Xue, C., Xia, Y., Wu, M., Chen, Z., Cheng, F., & Yun, L.
Affiliations
Yunnan Normal University (CN)
Corresponding author
Yun, Lijun
Venue
Expert Systems with Applications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-12
Volume
256
Pages
124848
ISSN
0957-4174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4400966748
Cited by
82
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 8
FWCI
11.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Expert Systems with Applications (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
small object detection, lightweight object detection, onboard deployment, edge computing, feature pyramid network, multi-head self-attention, Jetson Xavier NX, unmanned aerial vehicles, YOLO

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review