Species-specific biomarker responses reveal differential toxicity of microplastic type and concentration in Folsomia candida and Sinella curviseta
Abstract
Microplastics are recognised as terrestrial pollutants, but their sublethal effects on soil fauna remain poorly understood. We examined biochemical responses to three environmentally relevant microplastic types in two Collembola species, Folsomia candida and Sinella curviseta. Juveniles were exposed for 28 days in standardised soil to 0-10,000 mg kg-1 of polystyrene-HBCD, car tyre abrasion or a starch-based bioplastic blend. Analysed biomarker responses included acetylcholinesterase, carboxylesterase, catalase, and glutathione S-transferase activities; glutathione, reactive oxygen species and carbohydrate concentrations. Multivariate analysis showed that Species explained 84% of biomarker variation, whereas Type and Concentration had weak but significant effects. Car tyre particles induced the strongest glutathione S-transferase, glutathione, and reactive oxygen species responses in both species. Polystyrene-HBCD stimulated detoxification responses, while the starch blend caused weaker changes. Concentration effects were significant but non-linear and species-specific. These findings demonstrate species- and polymer-specific responses and support multivariate biomarkers as indicators of stress in soil invertebrates.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 47
- Authors
- Lončarić, Ž., Bjedov, D., Kovačić, L. S., Ečimović, S., Hollert, H., & Velki, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Osijek (HR)
- Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Velki, Mirna
- Venue
- Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2026-09
- Volume
- 126
- Pages
- 105097
- ISSN
- 1382-6689 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7168161191
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 47
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
- Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek (OZB\u22123105\u201310\u201323)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
- Keywords
- microplastics, Folsomia candida, Sinella curviseta, Collembola, soil fauna, sublethal toxicity, biomarkers, starch-based bioplastics, glutathione S-transferase, acetylcholinesterase, carboxylesterase, catalase, reactive oxygen species, glutathione, detoxification, species-specific responses, polymer types, concentration dependence, soil invertebrates
- MeSH terms
- Microplastics, Acetylcholinesterase, Animals, Arthropods, Catalase, Glutathione, Glutathione Transferase, Soil Pollutants, Species Specificity, Biomarkers, Reactive Oxygen Species, Carboxylesterase
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review