Cited by 145Heavy metals in environmentHeavy Metal Pollution RemediationEnvironmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies

Toxic metal decontamination by phytoremediation approach: Concept, challenges, opportunities and future perspectives

Patra, Deepak Kumar, Pradhan, Chinmay, Patra, Hemanta Kumar·2020·Environmental Technology & Innovation

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eti.2020.100672

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Patra, D. K., Pradhan, C., & Patra, H. K.
Affiliations
Utkal University (IN)
Corresponding author
Patra, Deepak Kumar
Venue
Environmental Technology & Innovation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
18
Pages
100672
ISSN
2352-1864 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3005631883
Cited by
145
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 17
FWCI
5.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Environmental Technology & Innovation (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Heavy Metal Pollution Remediation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies
Keywords
phytoremediation, heavy metal contamination, soil decontamination, agricultural soils, plant-microbe interactions, metal mobilization, plant selection, cost-effective remediation, organic pollutants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review