The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A comprehensive review on eco-toxicity and biodegradation of phenolics: Recent progress and future outlook
Open accessAbstract
The profound growth and development of industrial segments discharge enormous quantities of phenolic pollutants into the aquatic environment. Phenolic compounds are priority pollutants and their presence in the water system causes severe hazards to human health and many other living creatures. Thus, the removal of such toxic pollutants has gained a lot of attention in the past few decades. Biodegradation is a sustainable and efficient method for the removal of phenolic pollutants from the aquatic environment. Though microbial degradation of phenolic pollutants is well documented, enzymatic metabolic pathways, co-metabolic biodegradation, the use of sequential bioreactors, and the treatment of real-world industrial wastewater have yet to be adequately addressed. Therefore, the present review focuses on the assessment of biological removal of phenolic pollutants from the contaminated environment along with the various associated problems. In particular, the mechanism of ecotoxicity of phenolic pollutants on the living system, the functional enzymes and metabolic pathways involved in microbial degradation, including co-metabolic and co-culture degradation of phenolic pollutants, were elaborately reviewed. The use of aerobic granular sludge (AGS) in the treatment of recalcitrant wastewater has been addressed. The performances of various bioreactor systems are also compared. The prospects for resource recovery by photosynthetic bacteria that degrade phenolics are also discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bacterial Degradation of Aromatic Compounds
Seo, J.-S., Keum, Y.-S., & Li, Q. X. (2009) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph6010278 · Cited by 968
Tran, N. H., Urase, T., Ngo, H. H., Hu, J., & Ong, S. L. (2013) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2013.07.083 · Cited by 482
Photosynthetic bacteria wastewater treatment with the production of value-added products: a review
Cao, K., Zhi, R., & Zhang, G. (2020) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122648 · Cited by 110
Barik, M., Das, C. P., Kumar Verma, A., Sahoo, S., & Sahoo, N. K. (2021) · International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation · doi:10.1016/j.ibiod.2020.105168 · Cited by 89
Self-citation
Cited by
Manzanilla-Valdez, M. L., Ma, Z., Mondor, M., & Hernández-Álvarez, A. J. (2024) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.4c00380 · Cited by 58
Manzanilla-Valdez, M. L., Boesch, C., Martinez-Villaluenga, C., Montaño, S., & Hernández-Álvarez, A. J. (2024) · Food Hydrocolloids for Health · doi:10.1016/j.fhfh.2024.100191 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Panigrahy, N., Priyadarshini, A., Sahoo, M. M., Verma, A. K., Daverey, A., & Sahoo, N. K.
- Venue
- Environmental Technology & Innovation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-08
- Volume
- 27
- Pages
- 102423
- ISSN
- 2352-1864 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4212922732
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 11.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comprehensive review on eco-toxicity and biodegradation of phenolics: Recent progress and future outlook. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eti.2022.102423
- The paper
- Panigrahy, N., Priyadarshini, A., Sahoo, M. M., Verma, A. K., Daverey, A., & Sahoo, N. K. (2022). A comprehensive review on eco-toxicity and biodegradation of phenolics: Recent progress and future outlook. Environmental Technology & Innovation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2022.102423
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.