Cited by 91Renal cell carcinoma treatmentCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersFerroptosis and cancer prognosis

Impact of Clinicopathological Features on Survival in Patients Treated with First-line Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Plus Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Rizzo, Alessandro, Mollica, Veronica, Santoni, Matteo, Ricci, Angela Dalia, Rosellini, Matteo, Marchetti, Andrea, Montironi, Rodolfo, Ardizzoni, Andrea +1 more·2022·European Urology Focus

Abstract

Context Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have reported unprecedented results in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients, as monotherapy or in combination with other anticancer agents. However, little information is available regarding the association between different clinicopathological features and survival in this setting.Objective We performed a meta-analysis aimed at exploring the predictive value of routinely collected clinicopathological data in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating ICIs plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in treatment-naïve patients with mRCC.Evidence acquisition We retrieved all the relevant RCTs through PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE; additionally, proceedings of the main international oncological meetings were also searched for relevant abstracts. Eligible studies included RCTs assessing first-line ICI-TKI versus sunitinib in treatment-naïve mRCC patients; the primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), measured as hazard ratio (HR) with corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI).Evidence synthesis Overall, three phase III RCTs involving 1769 patients with advanced or metastatic RCC were included. Compared with sunitinib, the ICI-TKI combination significantly decreased the risk of death in patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) 0 (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.57-0.76) and ECOG-PS 1 (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.54-0.77). Similarly, the combination was associated with prolonged OS in patients who were <65 yr old (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.49-0.67), in mRCC patients ≥65 yr old (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.61-0.90), as well as in male (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.56-0.78) and female (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.52-0.83) patients.Conclusions According to our results, the magnitude of benefit of the ICI-TKI combination over sunitinib monotherapy in treatment-naïve mRCC patients was consistent across the clinicopathological subgroups. Despite the limitations affecting the analysis, we believe that the results of the current meta-analysis could assist clinicians and researchers in the design and interpretation of future clinical trials on combination therapies in this setting.Patient summary First-line combinations of an immune checkpoint inhibitor plus a tyrosine kinase inhibitor improved survival in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients. This survival benefit was consistent across all subgroups of mRCC patients irrespective of clinicopathological features such as patient performance status, age <65 and ≥65 yr, and male and female gender.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.euf.2021.03.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Combination therapy of ICIs plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma is more beneficial compared to sunitinib monotherapy.

    “Furthermore, it was reported that combination therapy of ICIs plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) were more beneficial compared to sunitinib monotherapy in these patients [8].”

    From Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Cancer Therapy (2022) · cites this paper as [8]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 91

Authors
Rizzo, A., Mollica, V., Santoni, M., Ricci, A. D., Rosellini, M., Marchetti, A., Montironi, R., Ardizzoni, A., & Massari, F.
Affiliations
  • Ospedale di Macerata (IT)
  • Marche Polytechnic University (IT)
  • IRCCS Azienda Ospedliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola (IT)
Corresponding author
Massari, Francesco
Venue
European Urology Focus
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-03
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
514-521
ISSN
2405-4569 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3134130070
Cited by
91
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 12 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Urology Focus (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Renal cell carcinoma treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Ferroptosis and cancer prognosis
Keywords
metastatic renal cell carcinoma, immune checkpoint inhibitors, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, first-line therapy, sunitinib, overall survival, clinicopathological prognostic factors, ECOG performance status, age, sex, predictive biomarkers, combination therapy, treatment-naive patients, randomized controlled trials, immune-related adverse events, immune-related pneumonitis
MeSH terms
Sunitinib, Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors, Carcinoma, Renal Cell, Female, Humans, Kidney Neoplasms, Male, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Protein Kinase Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review