Atomoxetine hydrochloride in the treatment of children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and comorbid oppositional defiant disorder: A placebo-controlled Italian study
Abstract
Objective The primary aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of atomoxetine in improving ADHD and ODD symptoms in paediatric patients with ADHD and comorbid oppositional defiant disorder (ODD), non-responders to previous psychological intervention with parent support.Methods This was a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial conducted in patients aged 6-15 years, with ADHD and ODD diagnosed according to the DSM-IV criteria by a structured clinical interview (K-SADS-PL). Only subjects who are non-responders to a 6-week standardized parent training were randomised to atomoxetine (up to 1.2 mg/kg/day) or placebo (in a 3:1 ratio) for the following 8-week double blind phase.Results Only 2 of the 156 patients enrolled for the parent support phase (92.9% of males; mean age: 9.9 years), improved after the parent training program; 139 patients were randomised for entering in the study and 137 were eligible for efficacy analysis. At the end of the randomised double blind phase, the mean changes in the Swanson, Nolan and Pelham Rating Scale-Revised (SNAP-IV) ADHD subscale were -8.1+/-9.2 and -2.0+/-4.7, respectively in the atomoxetine and in the placebo group (p<0.001 between groups); changes in the ODD subscale were -2.7+/-4.1 and -0.3+/-2.6, respectively in the two groups (p=0.001 between groups). The CGI-ADHD-S score decreased in the atomoxetine group (median change at endpoint: -1.0) compared to no changes in the placebo group (p<0.001 between groups). Statistically significant differences between groups, in favour of atomoxetine, were found in the CHIP-CE scores for risk avoidance domain, emotional comfort and individual risk avoidance subdomains. An improvement in all the subscales of Conners Parents (CPRS-R:S) and Teacher (CTRS-R:S) subscales was observed with atomoxetine, except in the cognitive problems subscale in the CTRS-R:S. Only 3 patients treated with atomoxetine discontinued the study due to adverse events. No clinically significant changes of body weight, height and vital signs were observed in both groups.Conclusions Treatment with atomoxetine of children and adolescents with ADHD and ODD, who did not initially respond to parental support, was associated with improvements in symptoms of ADHD and ODD, and general health status. Atomoxetine was well tolerated.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Atomoxetine efficacy has been confirmed in populations around the world, including for children with oppositional defiant disorder or those who have received previous stimulant therapy.
“studies in populations around the world have continued to confirm its efficacy [78-81], including for children with oppositional defiant disorder [82] or those who have received previous stimulant therapy [83].”
From Advances in understanding and treating ADHD (2011) · cites this paper as [82]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 66 · Cited by 54
- Authors
- Dell'Agnello, G., Maschietto, D., Bravaccio, C., Calamoneri, F., Masi, G., Curatolo, P., Besana, D., Mancini, F., Rossi, A., Poole, L., Escobar, R., & Zuddas, A.
- Affiliations
- Ospedale di San Donà di Piave (IT)
- Federico II University Hospital (IT)
- University of Messina (IT)
- Fondazione Stella Maris (IT)
- University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT)
- Eli Lilly (Italy) (IT)
- Eli Lilly (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Eli Lilly (Spain) (ES)
- University of Cagliari (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Zuddas, Alessandro
- ORCID
- Venue
- European Neuropsychopharmacology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-11
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 822-834
- ISSN
- 0924-977X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1974753535
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 66
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 3.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Bari Aldo Moro) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Keywords
- atomoxetine hydrochloride, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, comorbidities, children and adolescents, parent training, pharmacotherapy, SNAP-IV, Conners rating scales, adverse events, treatment discontinuation, Italy
- MeSH terms
- Atomoxetine Hydrochloride, Adolescent, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Child, Preschool, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Italy, Male, Propylamines, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Treatment Outcome, Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors, Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review