Cited by 54Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Atomoxetine hydrochloride in the treatment of children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and comorbid oppositional defiant disorder: A placebo-controlled Italian study

Dell'Agnello, Grazia, Maschietto, Dino, Bravaccio, Carmela, Calamoneri, Filippo, Masi, Gabriele, Curatolo, Paolo, Besana, Dante, Mancini, Francesca +4 more·2009·European Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

Objective The primary aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of atomoxetine in improving ADHD and ODD symptoms in paediatric patients with ADHD and comorbid oppositional defiant disorder (ODD), non-responders to previous psychological intervention with parent support.Methods This was a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial conducted in patients aged 6-15 years, with ADHD and ODD diagnosed according to the DSM-IV criteria by a structured clinical interview (K-SADS-PL). Only subjects who are non-responders to a 6-week standardized parent training were randomised to atomoxetine (up to 1.2 mg/kg/day) or placebo (in a 3:1 ratio) for the following 8-week double blind phase.Results Only 2 of the 156 patients enrolled for the parent support phase (92.9% of males; mean age: 9.9 years), improved after the parent training program; 139 patients were randomised for entering in the study and 137 were eligible for efficacy analysis. At the end of the randomised double blind phase, the mean changes in the Swanson, Nolan and Pelham Rating Scale-Revised (SNAP-IV) ADHD subscale were -8.1+/-9.2 and -2.0+/-4.7, respectively in the atomoxetine and in the placebo group (p<0.001 between groups); changes in the ODD subscale were -2.7+/-4.1 and -0.3+/-2.6, respectively in the two groups (p=0.001 between groups). The CGI-ADHD-S score decreased in the atomoxetine group (median change at endpoint: -1.0) compared to no changes in the placebo group (p<0.001 between groups). Statistically significant differences between groups, in favour of atomoxetine, were found in the CHIP-CE scores for risk avoidance domain, emotional comfort and individual risk avoidance subdomains. An improvement in all the subscales of Conners Parents (CPRS-R:S) and Teacher (CTRS-R:S) subscales was observed with atomoxetine, except in the cognitive problems subscale in the CTRS-R:S. Only 3 patients treated with atomoxetine discontinued the study due to adverse events. No clinically significant changes of body weight, height and vital signs were observed in both groups.Conclusions Treatment with atomoxetine of children and adolescents with ADHD and ODD, who did not initially respond to parental support, was associated with improvements in symptoms of ADHD and ODD, and general health status. Atomoxetine was well tolerated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2009.07.008

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Atomoxetine efficacy has been confirmed in populations around the world, including for children with oppositional defiant disorder or those who have received previous stimulant therapy.

    “studies in populations around the world have continued to confirm its efficacy [78-81], including for children with oppositional defiant disorder [82] or those who have received previous stimulant therapy [83].”

    From Advances in understanding and treating ADHD (2011) · cites this paper as [82]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 66 · Cited by 54

Authors
Dell'Agnello, G., Maschietto, D., Bravaccio, C., Calamoneri, F., Masi, G., Curatolo, P., Besana, D., Mancini, F., Rossi, A., Poole, L., Escobar, R., & Zuddas, A.
Affiliations
  • Ospedale di San Donà di Piave (IT)
  • Federico II University Hospital (IT)
  • University of Messina (IT)
  • Fondazione Stella Maris (IT)
  • University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT)
  • Eli Lilly (Italy) (IT)
  • Eli Lilly (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • Eli Lilly (Spain) (ES)
  • University of Cagliari (IT)
Corresponding author
Zuddas, Alessandro
Venue
European Neuropsychopharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-11
Volume
19
Issue
11
Pages
822-834
ISSN
0924-977X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1974753535
Cited by
54
References
66
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 9
FWCI
3.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Bari Aldo Moro) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
atomoxetine hydrochloride, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, comorbidities, children and adolescents, parent training, pharmacotherapy, SNAP-IV, Conners rating scales, adverse events, treatment discontinuation, Italy
MeSH terms
Atomoxetine Hydrochloride, Adolescent, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Child, Preschool, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Italy, Male, Propylamines, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Treatment Outcome, Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors, Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review